@Background Pony Number 17
Grammatically, yes, but the saying issights to see; it both matches the idiom “see the sights” and is the more common form of it. Additionally, “sites” implies locations where things either have happened or are still happening, not that the location in question is all that interesting to look at per se.
Grammatically, yes, but the saying is sights to see; it both matches the idiom “see the sights” and is the more common form of it. Additionally, “sites” implies locations where things either have happened or are still happening, not that the location in question is all that interesting to look at per se.
Actually, “sites” works just as well here. A site can be a sight to see.