Uploaded by Background Pony #B608
800x1100 PNG 101 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2256922 +-SH artist:marcusmaximus291 +-SH primrose52 +-SH fluffy pony7117 +-SH human266143 +-SH abuse10429 +-SH black and white18593 +-SH carnival214 +-SH claw machine107 +-SH comic139884 +-SH fluffy pony foal1085 +-SH fluffy pony mother844 +-SH future714 +-SH grayscale51645 +-SH machine1890 +-SH monochrome179757 +-SH sad32451
Loading...
Loading...
The fluffies may talk but this is only because they have a preprogrammed understanding(a very limited one) of language, they also lack any kind of higher thought or reasoning so no they are not sapient like humans, they are about as intelligent as lobotomized dogs with a language center but aren’t sapient and aren’t people, they just have some artificial instincts telling them how to talk and use drawing implements, but if you tried to teach them to use any other tool you’d invariable fail as there ability is the result of mindless programming rather than true intelligence. Of course them doesn’t justify the horrific abuse them suffer as they feel emotions and are as self-aware as your adverage cat. But can you really blame someone when a feral herd with a smarty shoes up and shits all over there lawn and they stuff them in the freezer for a few hours
You clearly have no understanding of how evolution works.
@Background Pony #B941
and how is that in anyway an incorrect view of the Fluffies existence. They were literally created in a lab to be toys for children.
They are live animals with almost human intelligence but people treat them as if they were just stuffed toy with motor and speaker. What if it is because Fluffies are on a higher level of evolution than humans?
Sir, you got it exactly right!
Well, she has been brainwashed to think that Fluffies have no purpose other than to be objects of fun for humans, so she didn’t know she was being that way.
Not sure which way its gonna go yet.
I was refering to this: >>211334
It’s still abuse, but approached in a rational way.
If you mean the art, I agree. If you mean the subject, I disagree.
He already drew abuse. And it was good.
Someone sounds mad. Also who’s Nobadu? The Japanese monk who teaches you the art of being an angry asshole all the time?
nobodu fucking cares, but i care making you know that no one cares.
That’s a good word for it.
Awdoraful?