Someone posted this under the name Hops on /mlp/, filename rara psa.png
and text ‘a public service announcement’
Part 2 is explicit. >>471026
Hops explains that “she’s just giving a disclaimer before she gets busy, she has a reputation to maintain”.
Facts mean nothing when the word in question hurts people’s feelings
/s
Edited
@Background Pony #BD11
Wait, hold on. How in the world are you confusing sex, with masturbation?
Edited
What’s perpetuity? <w<
Hush. This didn’t need reviving.
…thought as much. Therefore debate over.
Welcome to schiz^Wreal world, Neo.
It’s still not nearly as funny as hilariously broken logic that invents it’s own rules as it goes.
it is especially funny when you are not that kind of person or not that woman.
“slut” label comes from rape culture. “If she is a woman, therefore she gets laid, if she gets laid therefore she gets laid with everybody (and with me!), therefore she is a slut”.
It does make sense with her character. I think that’s why it frustrates me so much when people write her as someone that goes out and has a lot of sex. They’re clearly making some sort of association and it often feels like they present it as a negative thing.
@ushiki
Being labelled a “slut” actually doesn’t even require that. But if we’re going by the definition of those using the term, it generally requires quite a few different partners.
That makes me curious about the claim in this image: How do having multiple partners in a short span of time and liking sex have anything to do with each other? I’m not saying that it’s wrong to have multiple partners (even at the same time), but why is that something that goes along with liking sex? Can’t you enjoy having sex and do it with a single partner?
Maybe I’m too much the optimist. I’m still processing the pair in that “ha ha: only serious” mode and thinking the artist tried to make a good point but just fucked it up by trying to play to the wrong crowd.
Yeah, probably too optimistic.