@Background Pony #BCA5
Maybe it just seems that way, ’cause we usually see the female characters more, or most of the ones in “power” are female. (Like the Princesses, and mayor Mare.)
I would think there’d be a stronger demand for stallion’s rights in Equestria than Mare’s rights. Mares are already the dominant gender in their world.
@RandomBlank
Yet, unfortunately the rabid pseudo-feminists think it’s supposed to be about empowering themselves by “crushing” the opposition, placing themselves as the “superior” gender, and demonizing the opposite one.
Ironically, that attitude isn’t “empowering” them at all, and just creating more hate for feminism, and creating more misandry from women, and misogyny from men, and making the tensions between them worse.
To quote somebody on this site, you can’t fight sexism, with sexism.
The thing is, dictionaries are only as valuable as they really are and people make dictionaries. So what do the people put in and do they leave anything out? And what else is, I’ve found definitions for a word that was not defined in a dictionary where I looked. I didn’t even make up the definition.
@BarryFromMars
Same thing with the “feminism” word. No matter how hard people throw the dictionary at me I still refuse to have anything to do with it because of the people who make up today’s movement.
@BarryFromMars
I understand you perfectly. But stil, when people bring that up as part of their ideology I can’t help but shrug at them because most likely they don’t really mean. And as you said this could be the case for any word.
The same can be said for any word if the person doesn’t understand it. It’s not as if the word itself where in good use doesn’t have value, but in misuse and abuse it’s all like people jotting down numbers in a Sudoku puzzle improperly. Do you know what I’m saying?
I was going to post about that earlier but thought otherwise.
And I don’t want to get into that far, trying to figure that out as it is now is like shoving a barrel of confusion into my head. (Someone shed light on it please, show me what truth there is in it if there is any.)
Let’s just go to the basics: Lying is destructive. There isn’t any-thing to support the (ignorant) thought that everyone eating peanut butter and jelly sandwiches is racist. If “Racist Food” is given to you by someone who is “supposed to be offended by it” and the person says “I’m OK with you eating it, Be nourished by this good food!” (and is telling the truth about it) is it racist whatsoever? Food is food no matter what type it is.
@BarryFromMars@BarryFromMars
No kidding, I mean I can understand people getting offended by some things, but some are going overboard.
According to this one school was spending up to $500,000 to teach that peanut butter sandwiches are un-P.C., and racist…
PORTLAND, Ore. – Dr. Verenice Gutierrez, a principal with Oregon’s Portland Public Schools, has become convinced that America’s “white culture” negatively influences educators’ world view and the manner in which they teach their students.
For instance, last year a teacher in the district presented a lesson that included a reference to peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. Gutierrez says that by using sandwiches as an illustration, the teacher was engaged in a very subtle form of racism.
“What about Somali or Hispanic students, who might not eat sandwiches?” asked Gutierrez, according to Portland Tribune. “Another way would be to say: ‘Americans eat peanut butter and jelly, do you have anything like that?’ Let them tell you. Maybe they eat torta. Or pita.”
Gutierrez is not the only Portland administrator who has become obsessed with identifying such forms of alleged racism. Almost all Portland school leaders have gone through “Coaching for Educational Equity,” a week-long seminar on race that’s conducted by the Pacific Educational Group.
…Isn’t it ironically more racist to assume non-white people don’t eat peanut butter, and instead assuming they only eat food related to their ethnicity/ancestry?
Some people go overboard if they hear things they think are offensive whether it really is offensive or not. If you try saying something like “The sky is blue” among a crowd who will rip you to pieces if they hear it, you will need to run like this:
Y’know, why I think political correctness is going overboard? They actually bleeped the word “midget” on TV like it was as bad as a racial-slur… (Yet, some of the cuss words on said show weren’t bleeped.)
They’re making words that weren’t offensive before, (heck I used to hear “midget” in children shows) more “offensive” then they originally were by doing this…
Honestly, I think people getting to focused on being more sensitive to others is ironically just making them more uncomfortable around others different from them… “Oh! Look it’s a person who’s a different skin color then me! I better be extra extra nice to him, and be more careful of what I say, so I don’t seem racist!”
Well considering the last pony who held the title of king was exploded into crystal fragments. . . .
Maybe it just seems that way, ’cause we usually see the female characters more, or most of the ones in “power” are female. (Like the Princesses, and mayor Mare.)
In other words, in fighting fire with fire everyone involved is burned. Use water instead.
Yet, unfortunately the rabid pseudo-feminists think it’s supposed to be about empowering themselves by “crushing” the opposition, placing themselves as the “superior” gender, and demonizing the opposite one.
Ironically, that attitude isn’t “empowering” them at all, and just creating more hate for feminism, and creating more misandry from women, and misogyny from men, and making the tensions between them worse.
To quote somebody on this site, you can’t fight sexism, with sexism.
Language evolves.
“Feminism” used to mean a movement for equality of genders.
@monus783
The thing is, dictionaries are only as valuable as they really are and people make dictionaries. So what do the people put in and do they leave anything out? And what else is, I’ve found definitions for a word that was not defined in a dictionary where I looked. I didn’t even make up the definition.
Same thing with the “feminism” word. No matter how hard people throw the dictionary at me I still refuse to have anything to do with it because of the people who make up today’s movement.
I understand you perfectly. But stil, when people bring that up as part of their ideology I can’t help but shrug at them because most likely they don’t really mean. And as you said this could be the case for any word.
The same can be said for any word if the person doesn’t understand it. It’s not as if the word itself where in good use doesn’t have value, but in misuse and abuse it’s all like people jotting down numbers in a Sudoku puzzle improperly. Do you know what I’m saying?
thanks
Das Nightshade, the Claws of HEUGH.
what game is he holding?
You’re right, together, we must defeat Fury Belle! FOR JONTRON!
I was going to post about that earlier but thought otherwise.
And I don’t want to get into that far, trying to figure that out as it is now is like shoving a barrel of confusion into my head. (Someone shed light on it please, show me what truth there is in it if there is any.)
Let’s just go to the basics: Lying is destructive. There isn’t any-thing to support the (ignorant) thought that everyone eating peanut butter and jelly sandwiches is racist. If “Racist Food” is given to you by someone who is “supposed to be offended by it” and the person says “I’m OK with you eating it, Be nourished by this good food!” (and is telling the truth about it) is it racist whatsoever? Food is food no matter what type it is.
No kidding, I mean I can understand people getting offended by some things, but some are going overboard.
According to this one school was spending up to $500,000 to teach that peanut butter sandwiches are un-P.C., and racist…
…Isn’t it ironically more racist to assume non-white people don’t eat peanut butter, and instead assuming they only eat food related to their ethnicity/ancestry?
Correction! “If you try saying something like “The sky is blue” among a crowd who will rip you to pieces - or at least try to - if they hear it…”
Some people go overboard if they hear things they think are offensive whether it really is offensive or not. If you try saying something like “The sky is blue” among a crowd who will rip you to pieces if they hear it, you will need to run like this:
What do you mean?
Either that or inciting a riot in some instances…?
They’re making words that weren’t offensive before, (heck I used to hear “midget” in children shows) more “offensive” then they originally were by doing this…
Honestly, I think people getting to focused on being more sensitive to others is ironically just making them more uncomfortable around others different from them…
“Oh! Look it’s a person who’s a different skin color then me! I better be extra extra nice to him, and be more careful of what I say, so I don’t seem racist!”
Aren’t those different words? RE-tar-d (idiot) as opposed to re-TAR-d (slow/hinder)