Uploaded by Background Pony #E4EF
800x600 00:11.09 GIF 23.61 MB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2203104 +-SH artist:uncommented47 +-SH applejack202835 +-SH monster pony5029 +-SH original species37144 +-SH tatzlpony1811 +-SH g42058873 +-SH 3d125142 +-SH absurd file size3500 +-SH absurd gif size497 +-SH adoracreepy810 +-SH animated127979 +-SH apple21562 +-SH creepy5976 +-SH cute269998 +-SH eating13825 +-SH eyes on the prize6888 +-SH female1835293 +-SH grin64208 +-SH hay2026 +-SH hay bale1658 +-SH horror1155 +-SH imminent vore3197 +-SH it's coming right at us265 +-SH looking at you266092 +-SH maw1254 +-SH mawshot2791 +-SH nightmare fuel4659 +-SH offscreen character53687 +-SH open mouth243812 +-SH pov20703 +-SH running8255 +-SH smiling407875 +-SH solo1450050 +-SH swallowing2932 +-SH tail wag1556 +-SH tatzljack368 +-SH tentacles15728 +-SH that pony sure does love apples896 +-SH throat bulge5020
Loading...
Loading...
That’s what the “nightmare fuel” tag is for, I guess.
The fact that it’s just smiling casually the whole time only makes it even more terrifying. The tentacles and the way the jaw splits like that gives me flashbacks of The Thing. And that is not a good time. Especially since I was rather young and used to scare easy back when I first saw it.
I think it would’ve been suggestive even if it wasn’t pre-vore (I was just refering to >>960679 (deleted) BTW).
@Background Pony #331D
Vore, as a major fetish, always gets rated “questionable”. That Tatzljack one you linked was actually incorrectly tagged because it was uploaded long ego before the vore = questionable decision was passed.
the other one, being pre-vore, I tagged as suggestive just to be on the safe side of things.
Excuse me but what? How does bothering to add an “unwilling vore” tag makes it easier to look for willing vore images (especially as no one, not even you, is willing to do it)? Wouldn’t it be easier to, like, tag those overlooked willing vore images in the first place? Because, y’know, you’ll have to go through all the vore images to look for those that need tagging either way.
@Background Pony #331D
If that’s not obvious to you, then ask yourself why it is rated “suggestive”.
Also another one that’s not submissive: >>659467
The more unwilling vore images were tagged, the smaller the pool that would have to be searched through for potentially overlooked willing vore images. Why is the size of the “pile” to be minimized?
Okay, let me give you an example.
This is submissive POV: >>960679 (deleted)
This is not: >>608989
Then better tag what’s missing first before adding yet another tag to the pile.
@Ereiam @Ereiam
That gets you a combination of unwilling images, images that aren’t clearly willing or unwilling, willing images that were uploaded before the relatively recent introduction of the “willing vore” tag, and willing images that the uploader just neglected to tag.
But it’s 4714 images in all to sort through, so I’m sure not volunteering.
Exclude the “willing vore” tag when searching for forced vore images, I meant.
It depends of sexual submission, consensual or otherwise. Vore is yet another thing altogether, unless the picture’s subject teases the POV character by announcing her intent to have him as her next meal.
@Blissey1
We already have a “willing vore” tag. Seems more logical to me to exclude that one instead of creating yet another complementary tag (you can still do it of course, but since a majority of vore images is unwilling, wouldn’t that be pointless?)
“Unwilling vore” would be better, but even then I’m still not sure it fits
So if I introduced a “forced vore” tag (which presumably wouldn’t apply here), this could then be “submissive pov”?
@Ereiam
So it’s not dependent on voluntary submission?
Either way, “submissive pov” is for when the viewer is being sexually dominated by the character, preferably a towering female.
because it’s not tagged rape
well it’s not tagged POV
From what I can infer, the POV of >>1017701 is supposed to be Spike’s.
honestly, that whole tag is huge mess. there doesn’t seem to be any clearly defined criteria for it.
stuff like >>1069467 is quite clearly submissive and pov, so yeah sure. but then >>1017701 and the other images in the set aren’t POV at all so I don’t know how they can be submissive POV, and there’s more than a few images like >>964466 where, yes, it’s POV, but there isn’t the slightest indication of anyone submitting to anything.
So similarly, a pony towering over or saying/doing NSFW things to the camera isn’t “submissive pov” unless they’re clearly letting it happen? I counted; that’s about 92 images mistagged out of 111.
“Submissive” implies that the prey is letting themselves be eaten, that they are submitting, either because they want to be eaten or because they’ve given up on resisting. This is not always the case.
Being eaten isn’t submissive?