Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Higher res of >>36853 (merged)
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
That said, I love her tired expression. She deserves a nice soft belly rub.
>you will never wake up to this
I knew you would say that.
The caveman is a well-known connoisseur of insurance companies. You should be proud of your fiscally-responsible heritage. Your education system needs some work though.
Ooga booga.
At least me get gud insurance.
Technically, I said that first, so…
Peace out.
I feel like that’s a jab at me.
That thing would be awesome to have.
Yeah, you kind of are (no offense).
If we’re talking about prosthetics, then they’re just random bits of plastic/metal/carbon fiber/whatever attached to the body. They don’t even interact with the body, apart from touching it while being attached, so they wouldn’t interfere with pregnancy (or anything else for that matter, unless you were allergic to the materials, or they caused wear on your body).
If we’re talking about implants, then what are they doing? Chances are, they’re still not interacting with the body, not really. Something like a pacemaker, for example, is just placed within the body. It doesn’t do anything other than administer electric shocks when it needs to. It doesn’t react to anything, because it’s just an inanimate material. The body might reject the implant, but the implant won’t do jack shit.
If we’re talking about something that actually interacts with the body; say, a nanomachine with a construct similar to a cell, capable of whatever your cells are capable of doing, maybe designed to boost your immune system or something. That is something capable of affecting a baby in the womb. Let’s pretend it acts the same way your immune system does; it sees something it doesn’t recognize as you, it tries to get rid of it. Your body doesn’t do that because of millions of years of evolutionary design that says for it not to (I think it does happen sometimes, anyway). But the nanomachines haven’t been informed of that. Their programming says to destroy. The programming is always correct, as far as a machine is concerned.
tl;dr, I took this far too seriously. I’m so sorry for that wall of text.
Yeah, I suppose it’s better than someone shouting “OMG, SHE’S HAVING CYBORG BABIES, LETS TALK ABOUT IT AS IF IT’S POSSIBLE!”
So, yeah, better to ask than blindly accept something as the truth.
I mean this is science right? The whole point is to ask questions like these to try and prove or disprove them.
what a shame
Yeah it could be reprogrammed.
The pregnant pony is a cyborg, so it’s almost natural.
>get an argument about cybernetics
This is why I love Derpibooru.