They do say that making someone laugh is harder than making them cry.
While I may not personally enjoy rape jokes I do stand by their validity as humor in the case of people having the right to say what they need, as people would have the right to laugh at them, and I will have the right to personally scorn someone for making rape jokes, or bad ones (PDP). But if we’re to consider that making a person cry is easier than to laugh, there is an execution.
It’s a long, pretentious debate with a lot of view-points. But at the same time I find it rather amusing. Bob Mankoff, comic editor for the New Yorker points out that humor exists on the boundary of what we consider to be safe and normal, and the realm of the dangerous and exciting. Like riding a roller-coaster. I think Plato said that humor/comedy exists to challenge established norms and pre-conceived notions as a sort of internal/external observation that points out the absurdity of things.
So therefore, offensive humor exists to explore the dangerous and to seriously challenge our pre-concieved notions of a thing. And if we’re going to be legit about it: exists to make us wonder about a topic and to continually reconsider it.
But, I feel I have maybe committed a great hypocrisy/irony in explaining shit when I said it was a long pretentious thing, and then I went and did the long thing. So have a picture of a cat doing a funny thing.