The Rowling drama brings up an interesting quibble I have with the relationship between creation, creator, and the public at large.
The difference between a creators product made in good faith vs. being created to push horrible ideas.
For example, banning Harry Potter because Rowling is a dick, or shaming people who still like Harry Potter is, imo, wrong. That series wasn’t used as a mouth peice for Rowlings bullshit, or at the very least not obviously.
Banning Mein Kumph, or shaming people who like that particular tome is, however, perfectly acceptable. As that book was not only made by a monster, but also exists to push a monstrous ideology.
The line grows murky with, say, H.P. Lovecraft for example. As his toxic ideology does leak into several of his works, but I still put that under the former category of being wrong to ban/shame people.
It’s a matter of degrees, you see.