alias suggestions for low-usage "[color] [object]" tags

Kincyr

Non-Fudgsicle Token

I am suggesting aliasing the following [color] [object] tags to their respective base tags due to fairly little or no usage for the color-specific tags:

black bow -> bow
blue bow -> bow
green bow -> bow
light blue bow -> bow
orange bow -> bow
pink bow -> bow
purple bow -> bow
red bow -> bow
silver bow -> bow
white bow -> bow
yellow bow -> bow

black bowtie -> bowtie
blue bowtie -> bowtie
green bowtie -> bowtie
pink bowtie -> bowtie
purple bowtie -> bowtie
red bowtie -> bowtie
yellow bowtie -> bowtie

blue frills -> frills
green frills -> frills
light blue frills -> frills
orange frills -> frills
pink frills -> frills
purple frills -> frills
red frills -> frills
violet frills -> frills
white frills -> frills
yellow frills -> frills

black skirt -> skirt
blue skirt -> skirt
brown skirt -> skirt
dark blue skirt -> skirt
green skirt -> skirt
light blue skirt -> skirt
orange skirt -> skirt
pink skirt -> skirt
purple skirt -> skirt
red skirt -> skirt
white skirt -> skirt
yellow skirt -> skirt

I’m not going to make any suggestions for [color] socks or [color] panties, as there are some color-specific tags there that have usages exceeding 200 which IMHO, qualifies color-specific tags for those categories as widely useful

Posted 2 months ago Report
Edited 2 months ago because: added `[color] skirt` tags

Link Quote Reply

Background Pony #113F

I never quite know where to draw the line between “it’s factually correct, so leave it be” and “too incidental to matter, plus spawns too many tags to keep track of and make sure get implications”

For at least a few of these, it looks like you’ve been actively removing them, so it’s hard to get a sense of how much use they’d really be getting.

Posted 2 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Background Pony #4B40

@Kincyr

I’m not going to make any suggestions for [color] socks or [color] panties, as there are some color-specific tags there that have usages exceeding 200 which IMHO, qualifies color-specific tags for those categories as widely useful

I’d rather these get implications set up than be aliased because aliasing them will preclude them from ever meeting this threshold. Then I’d also +1 the following as working against some of these being able to gain traction too:

@Background Pony #113F

For at least a few of these, it looks like you’ve been actively removing them, so it’s hard to get a sense of how much use they’d really be getting.

Posted 2 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

LightningBolt

Senior Moderator

Undead inside

Rather not alias stuff like this away just because they’re small. Until it gets into super granular stuff like yellow and blue polkadots on a white background then plain colors are fine.

Posted 2 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Background Pony #8805

Deletion reason: Rule #6

Posted 2 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Kincyr

Non-Fudgsicle Token

@LightningBolt

Rather not alias stuff like this away just because they’re small. Until it gets into super granular stuff like yellow and blue polkadots on a white background then plain colors are fine.

fair enough

@Background Pony #113F

For at least a few of these, it looks like you’ve been actively removing them, so it’s hard to get a sense of how much use they’d really be getting.

for the bowtie ones, it’s because they were tagged on images containing bows that aren’t bowties (there’s one user that thinks bowtie is interchangable with bow and uses both tags despite a bowtie being a specific kind of necktie)
for the frills ones, they are a minute detail of the image, applied by one user, and usually only on his own uploads

Posted 2 months ago Report
Edited 2 months ago

Link Quote Reply

Background Pony #113F

More low-use color-thing tags:

(I don’t think “mint” needs to exist as a color specifier when “green” and “teal” exist ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ )

Posted 1 months ago Report

Link Quote Reply

Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!