Hey Guys, I’ve been noticing that some fans are very boring and usually whenever someone puts something applepie comes someone “they are cousins” “hurr duur is incest” so to “break it a little” I wanted to explain to you that this besides being annoying it’s lie
They do not have any blood connections, my people
Just the Apple’s 4-degree cousin who may be 5-degree cousin of the pie’s, but this does not affect Pinkie and Applejack at all
They do not have any blood connections.
The sister of pinkie pie (marble) Has crush in Big mac (brother of Apple) in 2015 several fans support this including Pinkie herself who has been trying to join the two
The writers themselves (including nick confalone) support Pinkie’s love relationship with Applejack, and the same said on twitter that you intend to make an episode of them (the same thing they did with rarijack but this time with pinkiejack/applepie) and I fully support it
so please, my people, no bullshit, respect the taste of people
be it character, shipp etc, just respect everyone, this makes fandom a better place
@Wesley Foxx
No, it isn’t just honorary. An aunt shares the same grandparent as you. Your grandparents are your aunt’s parents. Therefore there is a blood connection between big mac and marble pie
@PartsAndDrafts
Even if that is true, what ancestry they share is basically just honorary because they’d STILL not share any actual direct ancestry because Applesauce is still an aunt, not a parent.
(And I still think the proper solution to this would have been to join the families via Mac and Marble. Like what Bright Mac and Pear Butter did.)
@PartsAndDrafts
Thing is, the meaning of “by” in “4th cousin twice removed by a 5th cousin” is unclear.
The author of this chart seems to have interpreted “by” as “married to”, though I don’t quite see where the 5th cousin fits in here…
Personally, I’d say “4th cousin twice removed by a 5th cousin” is just Pinkie being Pinkie rather than an accurate description, but this is the Internet and we have to obsessively over-analyze children’s cartoons here.
Actually, the tree is a bit wrong. Apple Sauce is still blood related to her cousins. Apple Sauce’s G-G-G-grandparent is the same as Pinkie’s dad’s (representing the Pie family) 5G-grandparent by definition of a 4th cousin twice removed (or vice versa, since twice removal does not specify which individual is the earlier generation, but considering Igneous Pie is younger than Apple Sauce, he is the later generation).
What would you call Pinkie Pie’s exact relation to Applejack given that this tree is accurate? Is it 7th cousin 3 times removed, or something else entirely?
They do not have any blood connections, my people
They do not have any blood connections.
so please, my people, no bullshit, respect the taste of people
be it character, shipp etc, just respect everyone, this makes fandom a better place
Ah, about that…
Except Sugar Belle.
Direct ancestry. They’re related, but they share no one that made babies who made babies etc who made them.
… except for when the Sugar Belle tolls.
I ignored that “by a fifth cousin” part. In another scene, Pinkie omits it
No, it isn’t just honorary. An aunt shares the same grandparent as you. Your grandparents are your aunt’s parents. Therefore there is a blood connection between big mac and marble pie
Even if that is true, what ancestry they share is basically just honorary because they’d STILL not share any actual direct ancestry because Applesauce is still an aunt, not a parent.
(And I still think the proper solution to this would have been to join the families via Mac and Marble. Like what Bright Mac and Pear Butter did.)
Thing is, the meaning of “by” in “4th cousin twice removed by a 5th cousin” is unclear.
The author of this chart seems to have interpreted “by” as “married to”, though I don’t quite see where the 5th cousin fits in here…
Personally, I’d say “4th cousin twice removed by a 5th cousin” is just Pinkie being Pinkie rather than an accurate description, but this is the Internet and we have to obsessively over-analyze children’s cartoons here.
AJ’s great-grand-aunt’s spouse’s fourth cousin twice removed.
Like she said, “Fourth cousin twice removed, by a fifth cousin.”
Thanking the creator of the tree would also be a valid option.