Uploaded by ATMunn 
1024x1024 PNG 458 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
So recently I’ve been using a tag I made called “freaking adorable”, and all the images I used it on ended up having Twilight in them… So I decided I’d assign the tag to Twilight. And I also made this spoiler image for it. Twilight vector is here: >>1019202
Spoilered image template is here: >>1016515
Spoilered image template is here: >>1016515
Twilight Sparkle: STFU
@Joey
That’s what I’ve said!
Public-vote-tags, when?
Pretty much what @wenni said - there was very little difference between the separate tags, and often it was just a matter of opinion for however was editing the tags.
Really, even “cute” could be considered an “opinion” tag, and there has been cases where people would get in a tag war adding/removing that tag from images.
But there lies the problem. Those tags didn’t differentiate anything. They were seemingly applied at random, only governed by the image’s popularity and whoever decides to throw all the “cute” aliases on at once.
If what I’ve observed is true, you can simply search “cute” and sort by score (or use
score.gt:integer) to get a similar effect.And now I know how to cause sensible-but-nonexistent implications to be added!
@Joey
Yeah, that is/was an issue. All of these four were used for the whole gamut, and so now “cute” tag is filled with entire range, from “slight lip curve” to “dead from cuteness-induced heart attack”, with no way to differentiate (except maybe “wall of faves” and “upvotes galore”).
Yeah, true
I knew you were gonna do that :3
But it does, maybe you should look again ;)
How come it doesn’t imply “cute” and “Trixie” though?
We need an edit button on comments
No not really. ;) And I’m not personally bothered by it (I’ve created a few narrow tags (that quickly got nuked) my self), it was just as much a case of genuine curiosity. If it spreads, at some point someone is going to make an aliasing-request. If it doesn’t it’s going to die out. So I was partly probing if there was some specific thing that set it apart from the other tags; a facial expression or something.
Oh okay, thanks.
It doesn’t have the second “i” in her name, I’m not sure if that’s intentional or not: diatrixes
If you’re having trouble finding tags, you can always go to the tags page and search for a few letters out of the tag’s name, and see if it finds anything.
You mind reader D:<Oh, by the way, why can’t I find the “diatrixies” tag anymore? Am I not spelling it right, or does it not exsist? I thought I remember seeing it before.
We know when people are taking about us :D
Did someone say mods?
I’m not really sure, as I don’t handle tagging-relating matters as much as some of the other mods do. I think the thing was just the “as fuck” tags were being applied inconsistently, to the point where there was virtually no distinction at all between all four of those tags, and a lot of images ended up having all four tags applied at once.
Welp. Okay. (was really not expecting a mod to actually reply xD)
Oh… Sorry! Fair enough
“As fuck” implies higher intensity, doesn’t it?
Yeah, usually we’d prefer people just use the “cute” tag TBH. There used to be “cute as fuck”, “adorable”, and “adorable as fuck” tags, and they were all aliased (merged) into the “cute” tag because they all mean virtually the same thing, and that just lead to a ton of duplicate tags.
I couldn’t really find anything better for this that was show style. :\ Maybe sometime later I’ll look harder to try to find one that is cuter.