Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
The Travelling Pony Museum Shop!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

No description provided.

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

atalarikt
Artist -

EqG fan + Love Liver
@ED-SKaR  
I live in Indonesia. And rarely MLP stuff is sold there.  
As for those books, I’m more than sure that they will remain unavailable here until MLP becomes a real thing here.
ED-SKaR
Artist -
The End wasn't The End - Found a new home after the great exodus of 2012

@ED-SKaR
Do those books actually have content? If so, where can I buy one?
 
 
The books are written by GM berrow, but she has improved her writing a lot over the mane six series that were aimed at the “target demographic”
 
The Daring Doo books are still rather short (all three combined are about the length of the books I usually read) However, they make up for it by being very exciting!
 
 
I found them on amazon (in the UK) at a price slightly more than I would have liked. Depends what country you are in, but shop around on the websites where you get books in whatever country you are in.
Verbose
Gold Bit -
Emerald -
Since the Beginning  -

@Background Pony
 
full
 
Well-played, BP. Well-played.
 
However, my mistake doesn’t mean that my argument is false. It means I goofed in an example…a few of many bad or poorly-received spin-offs that I could go and find on Wikipedia.
 
My statements were ‘Spin-offs aren’t always fun’ and ‘It doesn’t mean it will fail or succeed.’
 
Had I omitted the Saved by the Bell example (where the New Class was still a spin-off, so regardless of the predecessor’s status of a spin-off, the spin-off was still a bad spin-off,) then there would be nothing to poke at.
 
Even though you’re right, you’re not poking a hole in the argument. You’re properly attacking an example in the argument (a non-crucial one.) The logic still stands, because I didn’t present those examples as the only cases of a spin-off being bad.
 
My argument was that a spin-off doesn’t always have to be fun/good.
 
So yeah, well-played, but unless you can state that every spin-off is fun, then my stance is valid, even with a small gaff in the presentation of the argument.
 
This is why I try to avoid absolute statements.
Background Pony #CC2B
would only watch if they had obvious recolours of the other characters in it too.
Background Pony #6CDA
Verbose, Saved by the Bell WAS a spinoff of Good Morning, Miss Bliss.
 
If one of your entries to show a spinoff can be bad is a spinoff of a spin off, you undercut your meaning significantly.
Verbose
Gold Bit -
Emerald -
Since the Beginning  -

Spin-offs aren’t always fun (e.g., Joey, the Friends’ spin-off; All Grown Up, the Rugrats spin-off; the Saved by the Bell spin-off, Saved by the Bell: the New Class, etc.) and I don’t watch FiM for the adventure aspect of it anyway.
 
It doesn’t mean it will fail or succeed. But I’d like to see what spinoff Hasbro and DHX would produce if they had a spin-off. I can’t help but think DHX would make it into gold, but only if they knew themselves the Midas Touch of FiM translated into their chosen spin-off.
Background Pony #E5AD
an episode ala “holo deck malfunction” where twilight either somehow magically makes her or changes RD into her could be neat.