Rainbow Rocks 10th Anniversary - Let's celebrate the 10th anniversary of Rainbow Rocks with an art event! Here
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Furry Body Pillows - Preset and Custom Designs

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

I saw a few months ago in imdb that Max will be the ne character Boyle, but nobody listened to me

safe2233150 boyle190 twilight sparkle366471 g42095100 my little pony: the movie21583 citation needed48 imdb53 ios199 irl85426 liev schreiber29 max martini3 meta18763 michael peña18 photo99327 rumor74 tara strong1394 taye diggs31 text94149 twitter3687 uzo aduba30

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

EyeGuy
Duck - quack
Fine Arts - Two hundred uploads with a score of over a hundred (Safe/Suggestive)

Dreading Season 9
I still wonder why they got a big name actor (who hadn’t even voice acted before) in such a small role.
 
It wasn’t for name recognition, because they didn’t advertise him along with the other celebrities.
immblueversion

@palettepony895  
@ArrJaySketch  
Exactly. Anyone can edit Wikipedia, which means anyone can add incorrect information, and it can go unchecked. In other words, people can just as easily say Max Martini is in the movie, but without the source, it would be free to remove. The only thing that makes Wikipedia better than IMDb in this regard, besides actually showing citations, is that it would be easier to remove.
ArrJaySketch
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Thread Starter - Started a thread with over 100 pages
Wallet After Summer Sale -
Birthday Cake - Celebrated MLP's 7th birthday
Artist -
The End wasn't The End - Found a new home after the great exodus of 2012

@palettepony895  
Wikipedia doesn’t automatically include the source; that’s up to the person editing the Wiki. “[citation needed]” markups are added by other editors, because the original editor neglected to source any of their information.
 
In which case, again, you’re still better off linking a source other than IMDB or Wikipedia.
OldAccount245
Artist -

h
@immblueversion  
I think that Wikipedia is a better “source,” because unlike IMDb, Wikipedia includes references so it’s easy to tell when something is true or false. If something is false on Wikipedia you can either A) blame it on the reference linked or B) tell it’s fake because there’s no reference to back up the sentence.
 
Plus it’s just so much nicer to use/edit :P