@Scp-3125
You’re right in that people don’t know the difference between Authoritarian Communism and Communist Libertarianism, yet I think you are not leaving room for a system with built-in forgiveness.

What anarchy will look like is a point of contention amongst anarchists and is one of the main areas of difference between the various anarchist tendencies.

Anarchist communism views anarchy as being a “classless, stateless, moneyless society” or “communism”. Not all anarchists share this vision of the future though thus the distinction between anarchism and anarchist communism.

The whole conversation is propagandized to be pointless though because the idea of the original Marxist intent of socialism is to shape of the new society will be formed in the course of the struggle to abolish capitalism by the working class themselves not in the minds of self-proclaimed anarchists during times of relative peace, this is what the whole entire socialist process is about. It’s the idea to systematically destroy any and all opposition through whatever means necessary, this unfortunately includes the family structure as the Family Structure is natural Anarcho Communism to which one may imagine.

It denies any room for error and The result has always been mass starvation and segregation. The Anarcho Communism I think you are getting at lays within nuclear family structure relations, which will naturally take place within any system that allows it, which also includes anarcho capitalism. A trade of favors can be used in the place of a trade of currency if both sides agree to the exchange.

The reason money is so crucial is that it is a very innovational tool that shows proof of your work. The pros and cons with money exactly that, the proof of your work. If your money is stolen, then it is a lie, it loses meaning, however the pros outweigh the cons in the sheer amount of time and effort saved for building trust between parties that other wise would not work with each other.

Capitalism encourages one to profit by working for one another, before capitalism all political systems save it be anarchy were based upon plundering and pillaging for self gain. Capitalism is a recent and beautiful invention, a mark of progress for humanity. The idea that everyone deserves love and respect, and many other unadulterated Christian teachings are very recent and good advancements in human history. Capitalism is on the side of progress, it is attacked by higher ups such as dictators because it works, and because it works they lose power over people like you, me and everyone else.

Socialism would work in theory but as Jason Brennan says -

“We’re not the Borg from Star Trek. We want to engage in private projects we do by ourselves and not with others,” says Jason Brennan, an associate professor of philosophy at Georgetown University.

Brennan’s new book, Why Not Capitalism?, casts a critical eye on a notion with wide appeal among academics, politicians, and the general public: That even though history has shown that socialism is unworkable in practice, it’s still the best way to run society in theory.

Brennan says that such thinking neglects the fact that even in utopia people will have significantly different visions of a life well lived. “You want a system under which you can realize all these different conceptions of the good life and the good community,” he argues. Even in a world free of petty rivalries, tribalism, and human failings, capitalism would still be superior because it uniquely affords citizens the rights and freedoms necessary to customize their lives and pursue their own, personally meaningful projects.

So to conclude, I would like to say that politics is controversial only because the personal has become political and that central Government has too much control in our personal lives and this has bled over into popular culture and thus bleeds over into online rules to indirectly provide government censorship. I’m saying that the personal should not be political and that it is your own business and I need to respect that, so should everyone else.

For clarification, I live under the United States current Socialist Democracy with capitalist black markets. With that said I would like to say regardless of any form of Government or System that we live under we are inherently Individuals that can and should think for ourselves. That Government ceases to work when people stop doing as they are commanded and unite as a people instead of enslaved individuals. It’s the same form of Resistance Gandhi proposed. Peaceful, Nonviolent Noncooperation. Ultimately it is up to us how much value we get from our current life and not just that in which we are willing to die for, but even more so in that we are willing to live for. For me I chose the purest form of friendship, love. I will live and fall for love, not for lust, and especially not for some stranger with a title of authority who has yet to earn my trust or respect. I write this because I care, because I have love for everyone even you. I hope that you all will read these words openly, with a clear head, without anger or malice. That you will see that I am not talking about some system we should be forced to live under, but rather letting a system of friendship and love grow unhindered by corrupt policing that Government so produces as Government cannot separate itself from violence to which it owes it’s very existence.

May we all learn to have these undeniably beneficial attributes of Justice, Diligence, Faith, Courage, Endurance, Love and Humility. I love all of you and wish the best for you. I wish the laws upon us to be just that we may have diligence in our works, faith to keep us motivated with courage and endurance to keep us moving forward and with humility we will accept each others love. Everyone, you are not alone, you are loved. We are all loved.

@Mix Heart
The problem is people don’t understand the difference between authoritarian and libertarian communism, thanks Joseph McCarthy, and just assume communism is synonymous with totalitarianism. It’s sad really, if it weren’t for the age of McCarthyism America might be more like Denmark, instead of being on the path of becoming a full plutocratic oligarchy

@Scp-3125
Correct but it also spits in the face of communism which is responsible for the most suffering and deaths in recent history but is for some reason not as well known as fascism and war mongering. There is a reason calling someone Commie used to be a valid insult. So Atlas Shrugged is not all bad but it’s no scripture to live by.

@Mix Heart
Isn’t atlas shrugged nothing more than objectivist propoganda?

@Communist Starlight
Atlas Shrugged is a flawed work but it has its good points. If only it valued kids and women as much as men.

But Atlas shrugged…

NOT queen chrysalis

Now, would y’all kindly buck them zap apples?

Who’s a silly pony?