Uploaded by Psyga315
640x360 PNG 183 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2236516 +-SH edit178731 +-SH edited screencap94381 +-SH screencap300894 +-SH princess cadance41412 +-SH twilight sparkle367038 +-SH alicorn329149 +-SH pony1666800 +-SH tatzlwurm277 +-SH cinemare sins251 +-SH g42098853 +-SH three's a crowd1524 +-SH female1874360 +-SH mare784944 +-SH twilight sparkle (alicorn)153238
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
–Susan Sto Helit, Hogfather.
The creature in fact was more concerned about using unnecesary force against the princesses.
If that thing really needed the flower, it would has been far more concerned about that instead the alicorn duo.
They are princesses, not the police. But I’m not sure how their royal/parliament system works. … And how can you own a flower illegally?
The princesses were going to take it for personal use, not to confiscate it. So that would make it theft.
I did forget omnivore. Could be an omnivore.
1.- Again, maybe he owned the flower without license, and both of them are princesses. Thus, they can take it away.
2.- You forgot omnivore. Maybe that thing eats both plants and animals.
According to Discord: “at the very edge of Equestria”, so that should still be in Equestria; as it should refer to right before exiting Equestria, from the perspective from Equestria itself.
Now, we need to determine if it’s a carnivore or a herbivore. Consider its aggressiveness, I would guess carnivore. — But it doesn’t change the fact that the princesses were the first jerks in this interaction by picking the flower. … What if someone just came by and picked Applejack’s big Apple? That would make her furious too.
The last one was a good point.
Where were those three nutcases again?
I’m sure the latter two aren’t illegal in Equestria; and is this creature even in Equestria?
I still think that thing may have done something evil before.
Like stealing cookies, jaywalking, or even owning a giant flower without license.
An assumption might not be wrong, but it still has no proof, and shouldn’t be taken for granted. — It should obviously not be ignored either until disproven.
However, a positive claim (such as someone has done something) should be proven, and not disproven. It’s hard to prove that someone haven’t done something.
An assumption that may have valid arguments……I can’t think in one right now, but it may be.
But that’s just an assumption