Uploaded by SlayerBVC
2000x2500 PNG 607 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH suggestive197035 +-SH artist:salemcat249 +-SH edit179928 +-SH edited edit2967 +-SH editor:slayerbvc1898 +-SH vector edit4691 +-SH fluttershy268143 +-SH sunset shimmer82342 +-SH equestria girls266779 +-SH g42118781 +-SH barefoot36414 +-SH bra23006 +-SH breasts413375 +-SH clothes673513 +-SH clothes swap2497 +-SH cutie mark underwear1008 +-SH feet57233 +-SH female1898639 +-SH high res412493 +-SH panties66873 +-SH pink underwear4761 +-SH simple background635253 +-SH skirt59672 +-SH tank top11489 +-SH transparent background298873 +-SH underwear82800 +-SH underwear edit1730 +-SH vector92401
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
But when seen much more from the side, then I would agree adding the tag.
Oh well, I’ll just leave it this time.
Even if it’s a thong, it’s only an implied thong. I don’t know if it should be tagged if the part that makes it a thong isn’t even visible.
I feel like there’s a point they reach where they are so thin at the point they go out of view that expanding back out to be a full back is physically impossible, these ones kind of give that impression. Mostly wondering whether I should stick “thong” in the tags really.
A lot of artists draw thin straps on panties, making it look like thongs. It’s hard to know for sure here, but it is a possibility.