Wild Manes Content - Read more about the new policy Here
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Sky Railroad Merch Shop!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

Just an edit…

safe2208593 artist:twilite-sparkleplz382 edit176817 starlight glimmer60978 sunset shimmer80369 equestria girls260272 g42063570 acoustic guitar270 bench3884 cute270889 duo183564 eyes closed142389 guitar6720 headphones10786 listening374 music4744 music notes4826 musical instrument15536 open mouth245297 playing guitar82 relaxing2179 singing8638 sitting95294 smiling410363
Source

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #5B13
rule 4
 
Please. People passive-aggressively whine about stuff like shipping in the exact way you asked that question all the time. For all I know, this continued dialogue could be one long instance of it, but I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt at this point.
 
My point is: in the future, you should be clearer about your intentions. If you want to be the tag police when you assume you’re seeing implied shipping, then say: “Hi, tag police here, I think there might be some implied shipping in this image, but I’m not sure. Could you clarify your intentions so I can correct the tags if needed? kthxbyeomglolbbq”
Background Pony #26CE
But another easily inferred reason is that you’re here to whine about implied shipping.
 
Why the hell would I want to do that? Not only would it be a waste of my time to state that on an image I could filter out, it would be breaking rule 4.  
There’s certainly compelling evidence toward that implication: the fact that you’re anon,
 
Buddy, you’re anon too. What’s the big deal about it anyway?
Background Pony #5B13
@Background Pony #E8FC  
The problem is in the way you asked. You did not state that your intention was only to make sure that the tags are correct. Perhaps that is a reason people might think is implied.
 
But another easily inferred reason is that you’re here to whine about implied shipping. There’s certainly compelling evidence toward that implication: the fact that you’re anon, the phrasing of your initial question, and the fact that the implication in question is shipping between two major characters of the same gender are strong indicators.
 
I find it highly amusing that you’re playing tag police regarding implications and yet you fail to tag your own intentions, thus causing others to mistake your intentions.
 
And on that note, no, it’s not an odd assumption at all. You’ve stated outright that you dislike implied shipping, and you are here playing tag police, so you must suspect this piece of implying shipping. QED
Background Pony #26CE
Well, it’s not tagged, so there’s no implication, then.
 
A lot of things aren’t tagged on this image. A lot of people don’t tag things when they upload images.  
Except in your head! And now you can’t un-think it! :3
 
That’s a really odd assumption. The picture is fairly ambiguous in whether or not it’s shipping, so why is it a problem for me to ask the uploader what their intention was?
Background Pony #26CE
@Background Pony #CB10  
Because if it is shipping, I want me and others who feel the same to be able to filter it out. What’s the point of a filter if no one tags the things you filter correctly?
Background Pony #5B13
@Background Pony #E8FC  
It’s fun. If the purpose of your question is for tagging, you should be upfront about that, and if you’re a staff member doing this work, you shouldn’t be doing so as an anon.
 
Therefore, I question your motives.
Background Pony #26CE
Any implications or is it just her listening to a song by Sunset and nothing more?