Uploaded by Background Pony #91F9
600x336 PNG 70 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2248790 +-SH edit179414 +-SH edited screencap94735 +-SH screencap301586 +-SH cozy glow10095 +-SH pegasus528423 +-SH pony1679923 +-SH frenemies (episode)1783 +-SH g42109297 +-SH captain obvious733 +-SH clothes668761 +-SH coat4166 +-SH female1887893 +-SH filly103628 +-SH no shit sherlock83 +-SH sarcasm in the comments17 +-SH solo1490326 +-SH we know6 +-SH you don't say158
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
A VERY EVIL child
Edited
She’s not a goat, she’s a pony
Right.
Well… At least he’s not going after real children…. RIGHT!?
Eww.
Edited
I mean, this isn’t statistically significant or anything, just one site blog and its commenters, and the tone of the post was probably a factor, but… does it look like it was a popular opinion at the time?
Or here?
If you’re a vocal minority, you’d probably feel a need to make your voice heard more, so that’s how I rationalize it, anyway.
I think it was a quarter or so people, at most that believed it back then, being generous.
I have no way of knowing for sure though, what the exact percentage was.
Nope even after that episode plenty of people were screaming that idea as reality. Heck, I even remember a few memes being posted on here after that episode.
and she’s definitely not Chrysalis..
Yeah, it’s funny how something like this functions like a Rorschach test.
Whatever topic gets brought up depends on them as much if not more than the image.
>in the presence of the image that states the obvious fact of what the character is the child in the work automatically triggers my reflex to whip out “actually she is FICTIONAL” like it’s lolicon discussion #29357184, even though there’s nothing about it or whenever she is fictional or not in the image
That’s a good question, but sadly off-topic.
Cool story bro
As far as we know, this is a Baby Dahl situation. She might have dwarfism, and is still young-looking enough to be mistaken for a child.
…or, maybe she’s fictional, and we should just move on. XP
Edited because: I can't spell.
That is a fictional pony.
>>2044095t (merged)
This is a fictional child.
This is a Fictional pony on the left and a fictional child to the right.
They are not real, just lines on paper/a monitor.
I personally think saying it was “half” the fandom that believed it is being generous.
The very next episode threw serious doubt on that theory, so it was mostly just a few hardcore believers in that theory that felt it held water, after that point.
Edited