Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Fallen Oak charity art pack - Nuclear Neighs and Deco Days

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

suggestive192998 artist:mrscroup571 starlight glimmer60837 unicorn552254 anthro366693 plantigrade anthro52884 g42058841 :p14651 ass81649 breasts398811 busty starlight glimmer3500 butt236922 clothes647066 feet55413 female1835234 glimmer glutes2474 kneesocks1589 leg focus281 legs12209 looking at you266066 lounging400 maid8138 mare761935 reasonably sized breasts4407 schrödinger's pantsu593 socks97539 solo1449985 stocking feet2658 thigh highs61475 thighs29188 throne4415 tongue out150275 vase823 zettai ryouiki2300

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

M1J
A Really Hyper Artist - 500+ images under their artist tag
A Really Classy Artist - 250+ images under their artist tag
An Artist Who Rocks - 100+ images under their artist tag
Artist -
The End wasn't The End - Found a new home after the great exodus of 2012

How is this image safe, but MrScroup’s image of Daybreaker suggestive? https://derpibooru.org/images/2619646
 
I thought the reason #2619646 was suggestive because Daybreaker was showing several degrees away from showing her underwear- she’s clearly not giving bedroom eyes or doing anything else sexually inviting. Meanwhile this image here also seems to be several degrees from alleged pantsu. It seems inconsistent to me to label this image safe and the other suggestive.