Uploaded by Velvet_Charm 
2804x3840 PNG 11.79 MB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
🔓PATREON UNLOCKED🔓| A Helping Hand
See my work a week early by supporting me on Patreon - www.patreon.com/Velvet_Charm
Tags
+-SH questionable121349 +-SH artist:velvetcharm117 +-SH oc949030 +-SH oc only689277 +-SH oc:raspberry glaze9 +-SH oc:snowdrop1403 +-SH butterfly9799 +-SH cat8915 +-SH earth pony505205 +-SH pegasus497736 +-SH anthro360354 +-SH 3d122879 +-SH anthro oc36911 +-SH arm around back89 +-SH blender14744 +-SH blender cycles3183 +-SH blind1298 +-SH blind oc5 +-SH butterfly on nose385 +-SH cane821 +-SH clothes635895 +-SH duo170939 +-SH earth pony oc25986 +-SH female1805913 +-SH filly97568 +-SH foal44415 +-SH helping187 +-SH high res407905 +-SH holding hands3933 +-SH insect on nose573 +-SH kitten379 +-SH looking away5664 +-SH oc x oc23921 +-SH orientation and mobility1 +-SH park1602 +-SH pegasus oc35945 +-SH shipping254557 +-SH sunny day100 +-SH teaching223 +-SH walking stick51 +-SH white cane9
Loading...
Loading...
Alright, probably should have clarified that with like a “lol” or something. Context.XD
you’re right, i’m not here to save the fiction horse children lol. i meant more it just comes off funny. carry on!
It’s a fictional character, not a real life child.
If I want to put a fictional character into something more appealing, suggestive, or outright explicit and find it attractive regardless of its age, then that’s my business.
Art is art, yes, but there’s a difference between reality and pure fiction.
Art is art to me, but I don’t know if you want to just say you did it to “make the child more attractive”
One: That “child” is a fictional character
Two: I chose to put said fictional character in high heels because it would make her appear taller and look more attractive.
Sorry, the signature is too obvious even at a smaller size, and at full size it’s just a small image of a topless woman over top. It has to be rated higher.
the logo has a topless girl on it in full color though. I’m pretty sure that counts as nudity. i would prob change your logo for sfw pieces
Um, the picture itself isn’t explicit or showing nudity of any kind. Just because my watermark isn’t “safe”, that doesn’t automatically make my image not safe either. Plus, you’re not going to see the watermark as clearly unless you’re purposely looking for it. The image itself is the main focus, and no where on this image does it show anything related to nudity, genitalia, or sexual or close to it.