two problems with this stereogram that stops it from working, firstly it’s wall-eye not cross eye so the normal cross eyed way of viewing stereograms won’t actually work.
second problem is there is next to no difference at all between the two images, there’s no shadow changes or depth (bigger difference the closer a pony is, less when it’s far) the only difference is one side is cut off a couple of pixels less than the other
@P3FOYFN, @Background Pony”:#comment_1876162
Yeah, it does need a bit more.
Aww shucks, you know how to make a gal blush!
Flash might be too much of a leap from after effects. AE also has the camera system, unless flash has that too? Oh man…. imagine a whole stereogram’ed animation. I think I just got a little wet
This is looks pretty good man but you could be on to something really great.
Maybe look into getting your feet wet in flash a bit or even animated .png type files and adding a bit more depth.
Keep being awesome. :)
No, because this is just the same image twice. It’s not actually 3D.
second problem is there is next to no difference at all between the two images, there’s no shadow changes or depth (bigger difference the closer a pony is, less when it’s far) the only difference is one side is cut off a couple of pixels less than the other
@The Talkie Toaster
I’m not seeing any depth at all. I think both channels ended up being identical for some reason.
Yeah, it does need a bit more.
Aww shucks, you know how to make a gal blush!
Flash might be too much of a leap from after effects. AE also has the camera system, unless flash has that too? Oh man…. imagine a whole stereogram’ed animation. I think I just got a little wet
Maybe look into getting your feet wet in flash a bit or even animated .png type files and adding a bit more depth.
Keep being awesome. :)