snusky

@Darth Sonic  

@Hugobertington.Esq  

y tho  
he’s the only male main character  
y u do thees to heem

….What? I don’t get it. And this looks like something Hotdiggedydeamon would make. No offense to him, big fan of his work, just sayin’.

@kassarc16  
That’s because they’re tagged wrong. Starly has a point, solo male/female was originally intended to make it easier for people to find certain questionable/explicit images. The solo tag was then made for non-questionable/explicit images. Somewhere along the line solo male/female started getting used for other images as well and things got confusing. Haven’t you wondered why “Solo Male, Safe” only brings up 200 images out of currently 3844? Or why the regular solo tag has over 123000?
 
Same with the breasts tag. Originally only for nude pics, which is why the mods had it imply nudity. Then people started using it on other pictures and asking where the nudity tag suddenly came from.

@Niggoslav_Krawczyk
 
IT’S ALL GOOD  

@Background Pony #282C  
IKR, who need them?  
_{taking your comment as sarcasm no matter what you intend}

Pfffffftttt, rights.

@tetrisman64
 
Lucario dances better  

@Niggoslav_Krawczyk
 
@tetrisman64
 
@Zennistrad  

 
TEH POKEMON THREAD WILL PREVAIL!
 
 
@Gary0ak
 
A TRUE believer!
 

 
Arceus bless you!

@Zennistrad  
Related to Mr. Hankey.

@tetrisman64
 

 
Shit Pickle!

@Gary0ak  
Dancing pickle thread  

@Darth Sonic  
Dancing lucario thread  

@TexasUberAlles Ah, dang. The tiny pic made me confuse-ed. I coulda sworn it was Bruticus, though I was wondering why his head looked so strange.
 
@Darth Sonic We could always do a cute gif thread too :v  

@TexasUberAlles  
w00t! Pokemon thread!
 

@Darth Sonic  
AH STILL BELIEVE IN THA DREAM  

 
@Niggoslav_Krawczyk  
Dat’s Sixshot, dawg. Mess yo’ ass up six ways from Cybersunday.

@Background Pony #3D02  
I know it would, Tara Strong and Lauren Faust would guest star.

@Background Pony #3D02
 
Alright. I just think that people should be careful to make sure their arguments hold up under scrutiny. It’s a bit of a pet peeve of mine when people have an opinion I agree with but support it with faulty logic.

@Background Pony #5282  
No you know what. Stop talking about texas. Holy shit why are we even discussing a well known troll like him who never has anything meaningful to say. Enough, just enough.

@Background Pony #5282  
If texas doesn’t want to be equated with rabid feminists, he should stop acting like a rabid feminist. May I remind you that this was his other reply to me:
 
“Are… are you for real? Sign in, son, I’m gonna need you to provide some sort of evidence that you’re not a random joke bot or a comedy subroutine, ’cuz if you’re an actual person that level of delusion and schizophrenia isn’t funny any more.”

@Background Pony #3D02
 
I never said or thought it was Texas alone. You said, and I quote:
 
“This is rich. One one hand feminists insist that men’s rights isn’t even a thing and at best exists as a fringe group on the web, and on another hand rabid feminists tell you to look out of the window to see a men’s rights advocate.
 
Feminists! Logic need not apply.”
 
You’re acting like it’s a logical contradiction for feminists to say that MRAs are everywhere while at the same time being a fringe group that doesn’t exist outside the internet. That is true, but Texas never said anything about MRAs being a fringe group, so he’s not contradicting himself.
 
And before you say that you’re not talking about Texas in particular, let me remind you that you stated this in reply to his post. You were clearly and deliberately directing this at him, even if you never said his name.

@Background Pony #5282  
Feminists would like it if you didn’t generalize their group with silly stuff like radfemhub where people masturbate over the thought of men dying and tumblr with their extreme hatred for anything male. Feminists would also like it if you thought feminism meant “The radical notion that women are people”.

@Background Pony #3D02
 
Again, I never said you were wrong. In fact, I actually agree with your point. I just think the line of logic you used was bullshit and shouldn’t be encouraged.
 
Just because other people make generalizations about a group doesn’t mean you should. If it’s wrong for them to do it it’s also wrong for you.