Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
My Little Ties crafts shop

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

No description provided.

safe2215875 artist:fluffytaffy12 artist:the mungoman50 fluffy pony7106 :p14814 abuse9829 axe2199 corkscrew9 dart76 grimderp335 immortality is awesome49 invulnerability3 knife7362 looking up24985 nail164 needle875 oh come on145 pencil4936 pin470 scissors1471 screw69 simple background618366 sitting95948 smiling413580 syringe1183 tongue out151741 underhoof71022 weapon42274 white background169651

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Joseph Raszagal
Wallet After Summer Sale -

Emily Brickenbrackle III
@Takugenji  
It could also just be straight-up invulnerable. Sure, you can poke needles into it, but that doesn’t mean it’ll bleed or feel pain.
 
And it’ll also still want to hug you. While covered in hundreds of extremely sharp things. You do the math.
ShimmeringStallion

@Background Pony #30FB  
Fiction.
 
That’s another argument of justification some often use, but it’s used more by the fans of the artists, rather than the artists themselves. Somewhat of a “I can see and make these images and there’s never going to be any repercussions of doing so”. It DOES mean a lot to some people. And I’m not justifying it, I’m just saying the justifications others say, because there’s always people who say they “don’t understand it”.
Background Pony #5BAC
@ShimmeringStallion  
Don’t try to justify torture porn with logic. It only exists because people like drawling sadistic art. In pretty much any modern western society what is often done to fluffies in fiction would be considered an atrocity to the same level or even more so than dog fighting.
Background Pony #5BAC
@ShimmeringStallion  
No, it is literally a case of  
A (bio) = B  
and  
C (Toy) = D  
BD = E (Pet)
 
And there is one huge difference between a pet and a toy. A toy is none animate, it doesn’t move, breath, have functioning organs, or think complex thought like a living animal does. A pet in the realistic sense is a living animal held in captivity for amusement and entertainment, but is kept well in doing so. And the same basic right as a living being to be treated humanely is what would realistically apply to a Fluffy, ESPECIALLY considering the fluffies show some degree of self-aware sentience and can actually talk.
 
Yes we may kill a rat, but a vast majority of rat traps these days are humane traps that kill it instantly. We don’t stomp on a rat or torture it to death to kill it. And we certainly wouldn’t consider it normal for someone to do that to a dog, which would be even lower on the sentience scale than a fluffy.
ShimmeringStallion

@Background Pony #30FB  
Bio-Toy can be considered a synonym for “pet”, but it’s not necessarily the meaning for it. It’s like that old algebraic question of “A=B. B=C. Does A=C?” With the answer being “Not necessarily”.
 
And it’s this loophole that brings about the belief in many, that it’s alright and socially acceptable to kill them with or without harmful intent. They can just as easily be treated as rats and stepped on accidentally, with minimal caring as a result. Or, of course, used in plenty of torturous experiments.
Background Pony #5BAC
@ShimmeringStallion  
“Bio-Toy”
 
Bio, an old Greek term (Bios) meaning “Life/Living”, root of the word biology.
 
Toy, a Middle English term meaning “Object to be played with or give amusement.”
 
By the very definition, “Bio-Toy” is a synonym for “pet”, as outside of working animals or livestock, all pets are kept for amusement and play.
 
Bio also correctly implies this critters are alive, having functioning organs and conscious thought; and thus subject to the same rights or decency of all living things. Humans can be real bastards at times, I should know, but a vast majority are biologically hardwired to be behave placidly to something weaker than us. Shows compassion to a weaker force is a classic sign of being human and likeable (hence why the most common trait for fictional heroes and heroines is to visibly pet and or own a dog or equivalent, no joke).
 
Raccoons are biologically useless to 99% of all urban humans who meet them. They nest in buildings, eat our food, poop all over the place, breed explosively, and can carry horrid diseases. Yet, almost all people I know who see a raccoon are neutral or even friendly towards them. If someone locks one up and tortures it, he or she is seen as a freak.
 
Needless to say, even as someone who hunts and fishes regularly, the torture porn I see with these annoying little fuzzball ponies is sickening.
ShimmeringStallion

@PurplePresident  
Okay; there’s plenty of reasons that other people have given.
 
  • They do little more than piss, poo, eat, talk, and breed.  
  • They’re insanely fragile.  
  • They take a large amount of care to be able to care for with minimal payoff, considering how long they live for (often debated, but seem to be 7-15 years, without them ever improving from a seemingly infantile state).  
  • They cause massive messes.  
  • They can speak, but not well, which annoys people.  
  • They were made as a “bio-toy”, rather than as a pet, which some justify as a reason to kill them; it’s no pet and there’s no laws against it; they’re just ‘toys’.
     
    I could go on, but I won’t (but I could). Also, that comment about Fluffle Puff… Do yourself a favor.
     
    >>773868
     
    Don’t turn around.