@Kappe  

@Lunalove  
Chrysalislover disappeared quietly into the night like 2 months ago, unfortunately.

This is what Chrysalislover sees walking up the aisle. His Goddess.
 
Wedding dress: [i]very[/i] revealing. Fishnet stockings. High heels.
 
Final Destination

I tried.

This is SO beautiful >w<

Love it.

@Kappe  
And you’re completely free to have that opinion. But there’s enough non-human features that it could go either way (notice the definition you quoted says “or”, not “and”, and definitely not “all of the above”), and since the person who drew it says it’s anthro, then that’s a good enough reason to say that this is intended to be an anthro picture.
 
At any rate, this comment section has been derailed for long enough, so if you wish to discuss the issue further, then please make a thread about it in the Site and Policy Forum.

@Blossomforth  
I… I just gave you the definition of humanized on this site. I don’t understand. It literally can’t be any more clear.

@Kappe
 
It’s your opinion that it’s incorrect, not a fact. There’s no solid definition/distinction between when an image is “antro” vs when it is “human with pony features”. So some may think this picture is anthro, some may think it’s humanized.
 
For cases where it’s on the fence like that, it’s best to go with what the artist says it is - they drew it, so they would know better than anyone else what it’s supposed to be. Keep in mind that unlike on Derpi, DA only allows the artist/uploader to set the tags for an image, so the fact that it is tagged “anthromorphic” at the source indicates that the artist himself said the image is anthro.

@Blossomforth  
Why the heck does the source tagging have any relevance when it’s clearly incorrect? Seriously?

@Kappe  
@Blissey1
 
Again, if the artist tagged it “anthro” at the source, it’s anthro.

@Blossomforth  
but we have specific humanized tags for all of those non-human qualities. The only non human quality we don’t have tags for are hooves(and then it might still be satyr) and muzzle/snout, and that’s when you know it’s anthro.

@Blossomforth  
humanized  
Detailed description:  
A non-human character drawn as a human. May include a tail, wings, pony ears, or a horn. For humanized art with tails, wings, pony ears, or horns include also the tags tailed humanization, winged humanization, eared humanization, or horned humanization, respectively.
 
:/

@Blissey1
 
The artist tagged it as “anthromorphic” on the source, and when in doubt, it’s best to just trust what the artist says. Additionally, she has several non-human qualities (wings, horn, large ears), which pushes it into anthro territory regardless.

@Blissey1  
The commission was for Anthro, just like the Rarity ‘fairy’ image Danmakuman did.

@SocDev  
What? But we have tags such as winged humanization, horned humanization, etc…? And there are unnatural skin color humanizations, e.g. Equestria Girls…?
 
What usually distinguishes anthro from humanizations is the facial structure. Her face is 100% human.

@SocDev  
then why do we have a “pony coloring” tag?

Anthro: A character with semi-human but not fully human anatomy.
 
She is black, and i am not talking about the human’s ethnic kind of black. So its anthro. Plus, you know, wings, horn…

@Muad’Derp  

 
Replace your children with changelings* (Not that they’re any strangers to transfiguration, mind you.)

@Background Pony #31C2  

 
Well ye olde fairies did “poison your well, kill your cattle and turn your children into changelings”.

@RIG  
the definition used here isn’t always the same as the definition elsewhere

>DA tag: anthro  
Now stop, blissey.

Btw have we a fairy tag?

Cryssi is best Fairy………wait wat

Oooh~ <3