@Wiimeiser
That sounds so oldschool Japanese, its hilarious.

@Darth Sonic
Sonic is prohibited from showing excessive emotion, due to mandates from Sega.

@TyroneBiggums
Yeah, it would be much better if all the characters were stiff and lifeless.

 
God

that is inaccurate and unprofessional! giraffes do not have hair!

@Darth Sonic  
I remember/used to have that issue.

@Darth Sonic  
Huh, weird, even for that series.

@Beau Skunky  
Yep. Due to weird confusing melodrama shit, Tails had been replaced with a FULLY SAPIENT doppleganger for the last 20 ISSUES, who killed himself right beforehand so that Sonic could reunite with the real deal.
 
Now, I should note that the writing presents this as the tragically bittersweet moment that it is, but Ron’s art certainly doesn’t portray it.

@Darth Sonic  
I hasn’t seen that Sonic issue, is that what happened?

@Beau Skunky  
Sonic just watched someone commit suicide, and doesn’t seem to care. :P

@Darth Sonic  
I’m curious how he’d draw ponies. Probably better then his hedgehogs.
 

@Beau Skunky  
Man, I’m suddenly getting nostalgic for Ron Lim…

@TyroneBiggums  
I doubt it, Fosgitt seems like a nice guy from what I’ve seen. No need to question his personality, or jump to conclusions about him just ’cause you dislike his pony art.

@Beau Skunky  
Huh, suddenly im reminded why John K doesnt get nearly the amount of work he use to get. Comparing him to Fosgitt really set things into perspective…wonder if Fosgitt is as notoriously bad to work with as John K.

@CMC Scootaloo  

 
I wouldn’t go that far honestly.., I think the IDW staff get along pretty well. They both probably just made a mistake. I don’t think there’s any “conspiracy” against Fosgitt. Even fans who’d try to get him fired would have no luck if they tried. (They couldn’t even get writer Ted Anderson fired. Though, let’s not get into the Anderson drama.)
 
@TyroneBiggums  
Honestly, I’ve seen worse, though admittedly the giraffe is a bit weird looking, and some issues like the Daring Do & Fluttershy one weren’t his best, but they still had good moments, and facial expressions in it, I felt.
 
I disagree he’s always off-model, though what some people seem to mean by that is, his art either don’t look like correct horse anatomy, (granted, ponies in the show resemble real horses as much as Knuckles resembles a real echidna to me) or doesn’t look exactly like vectors taken straight from the show, which is apparently how some think everybody should draw them that way. Honestly, I like how his art looks a li’l different from emulating the show style. It’s a nice change of pace from every other IDW artist whom draws like the show style) as I do see some hints of the show style in his art style. (Like say big eyes, small snouts.) To be honest, I think cartoons look better when they go off-model occasionally, and I like seeing different art styles sometimes. The show does that alot too, like wherever a character does a funny facial expression, or something they tend to look off, but not in a bad way. To quote John K. “Staying on-model is for commies.”
 
Also, if you look at my post below I posted images of the more beloved IDW comic artists also drawing the characters off-model, (and not in a good way) or half-assing panels, so they’re guilty of it too. But nobody seems to hold them to the same standards as Fosgitt now all of a sudden. (Which is ironic, ’cause Tony Fleecs used to get as much guff as he did, and people used to be quite critical of how Andy draws Spike.)

@Background Pony #5A1D  

 
Nothing about Fosgitt is One Model. Thats the problem. His Style is too distracting to the point where a pony just standing there looks overly expressive. But its not for expression’s sake, its the obnoxious style cause I KNOW he can do better, but it feels he saves his worst for pony stuff.

@Daring-Do  
and this is why you don’t try to learn more about people…

@Daring-Do  
You mentioned that. My response?  
>>1348731t (deleted)

@Meanlucario  
His theory also held that having sex with foals was necessary for the survival of Equestria (I think he claimed it was necessary to repel the windigos or something?), and so it was a vital part of their society.

@Daring-Do  

@Meanlucario  
He’s not. Check his profile here. He’s an admitted “foalcon enthusiast”. He was linking this thesis in multiple places on Equestria Daily a while back, presenting it as fact. He also argued that pedophilia doesn’t hurt children. When I tried arguing with him about how his theory makes no sense, he told me I was only disagreeing because I was “closeminded”.
 
His theory also held that having sex with foals was necessary for the survival of Equestria (I think he claimed it was necessary to repel the windigos or something?), and so it was a vital part of their society.

@CMC Scootaloo  
If I’m reading that right, I’m hopping that you’re joking.

@Daring-Do
 
Thanks. This was a long time ago….. It’s one of the most detailed and in-depth analysis I made, so I’m glad people remember me for that. :)

@CMC Scootaloo  
This frankly sounds nearly as ridiculous as the long thesis you were posting on EQD a while back about pedophilia being normal in Equestria and Rarity and Sweetie Belle being in a sexual relationship.