I have worked as a teacher with children and I know a great deal about how they think and how malleable they can be. I would never have shown this to my younger students. We turned down all sorts of special interests groups all the time that wanted access to the classroom. Shaping the minds of young children is a very powerful tool to wield. We had the strictest guidelines from the government on what was allowed and what was not allowed.
I understand where you’re coming from, but keep in mind that that’s a means for the government to ensure it has a monopoly on education and information. Not always is a government actually right about what should be available to children, and in most cases i would even say that governments favor educational ideologies that obscure reality and present an idealized, static and frictionless vision of human society to preserve the status quo. Obscuring knowlege about LGBT+ people from schoolchildren comes with its own set of problems such as perpetuating bullying and marginalization. Because society does not stay in one place forever, it is always important to
push for change in education.
Dumping the full weight of LGBTQ+/BLM ideology on a 6-7 year old is not a good idea. This needs to come later gradually, having this shown so brazenly on Nickelodeon is shocking to me and I bet there will be a ton of parents protesting it.
Again, parents protest against a lot of things when it comes to children and school, even when the children are okay with it. Often they don’t do so out of logical thinking, but out of a desire to control, and many parents indeed scrutinize their children for entertaining thoughts and behaviors outside the norm. One thing schools can and should do is clarify to students’ parents about what is being taught in class, and then invite them to try and disprove what is being taught: chances are the parents know almost nothing about the subject at hand and got their information on it from partisan sources without first trying to experience what is being taught.
Adapting kids to how 5% of the population is with such heavy handed means is very radical.
I heavily disagree that LGBT+ people comprise only a twentieth of the population in the US. There are large ammounts of people both young and old who remain in the closet (so to speak) out of fear of social scrutiny. African-Americans barely comprise around 13% of the US population, does this mean that their history should not be taught or that their social, cultural and economic concerns are negligible?
The number of people who don’t conform to traditional gender standards is steadily rising over the years and successive generations – the 1950’s-era WASP nuclear family with its strict gender and work roles being the only available option is no longer logical in our modern 21st century capitalist society, and attempts at indoctrination to make it appear otherwise so far seem to be failing.