Forcing Disney’s Frozen’s canonical Anna to be Arendelle’s canon queen’s a cruel idea.

Did Disney’s Frozen’s canonical Anna really want to be Arendelle’s canon queen? Hello? Will no one answer me?

Anna should’ve gotten to experience her freedom canonically.

Elsa was 24, whereas, Anna was 21.

Elsa and Anna - Are they really too different to be sisters?

Disney should’ve spared Elsa the trauma in canon, too.

Elsa had no intention of losing control of her ice powers. She had no intention of letting the traumatic childhood accident occur. She had no intention of setting off an eternal winter, either.

In fact, was there any way Anna would be Arendelle’s queen? Does she really have the patience? Does she even know how to run a kingdom? Anybody understand why they even made Anna queen anyway? Elsa can go back and forth between the two worlds. Disney should’ve let Elsa remain Arendelle’s queen in canon at the end of Frozen 2. Disney should’ve allowed Anna to live in the Enchanted Forest at the end of Frozen 2.

Was there any way Anna would be Arendelle’s queen. Does she really have the patience? Does she even know how to run a kingdom? Anybody understand why they even make Anna queen anyway? Elsa can go back and forth between the two worlds. Disney should’ve let Elsa remain Arendelle’s queen in canon at the end of Frozen 2.

Do Anna and queen really ever go together?! Was she ready for that job?

Sorry, however, that Frozen 2 ending… and quite frankly the entire movie, Frozen 2 was bad… the ending made it worse. There’s no way Anna would be Arendelle’s queen, she doesn’t have the patience or even know how to run a kingdom if I should take back what I just said. I don’t get why they even make her queen anyway? Elsa can go back and forth between the two worlds. Disney should’ve let Elsa remain Arendelle’s queen in canon at the end of Frozen 2.

I prefer Elsa as Arendelle’s queen and Anna as Arendelle’s princess. And why would Elsa need to live in the forest because of the spirits? Before she was born, the spirits were alright without a fifth spirit…, weren’t they?

One’s klutzy and outgoing is Anna and the other’s a magical sorceress who doesn’t want to hurt other people because of her abilities growing out of control is Elsa.
 
Anna’s klutzy and outgoing, whereas, Elsa’s a magical sorceress who doesn’t want to hurt other people because of her abilities growing out of control.

If Elsa wasn’t in this movie, Anna wouldn’t go to the mountain, there would be no Kristoff, no Sven, either, nor Marshmallow, nor Snowgies, nor even Olaf. There would be no movie. Also, the film’s based off “ The Snow Queen” which is Elsa.

The Snow Queen’s the good guy, she has a summer-themed sister with loneliness issues, the emphasis on warm/frozen hearts, the heroine has braided red hair, the hero has blonde hair…

In Andersen’s version, the Snow Queen is more evil rather than misunderstood like Elsa. Kai and Gerda are best friends and Kai’s the recipient of troll glass in his heart and eyes, paralyzing kisses, and brainwashing from the Snow Queen. It’s more complicated, but Disney completely turned it around with two royal crown princess sisters instead!

Growing up, I’ve seen a lot of the classic Disney films feature love stories between the protagonists and their love interests. But what about familial love? It can be just as powerful, can’t it? And I’ve seen some newer films and stories focus on the theme of familial love, even showing that it is stronger than romantic love.  
Example: Anna and Elsa from Frozen  
One of my favorite things in this film is the story of the two sisters. They were close as kids, drifted apart, and it is through their adventure that they become close once again. But what is it that saves them? It’s the familial, sibling love that they have for each other. Anna sacrificed herself to protect her sister, which also lifted the curse of her being frozen solid. In addition, Elsa learns to control her powers and end the winter she unleashed because of the love she and her sister have for each other. So yeah, while Anna develops a relationship with Kristoff, and I like Kristoff and her together, it is the family love between her and her sister that is more appealing. That kind of love is what triumphs over the kind of problems that happened in their story.

Yeah, I really couldn’t decide which of these two I liked better. On the one hand, Elsa the Snow Queen’s a more complex character who’s essentially the anti-heroine of the film: she is by no means imaginable a villain, but it’s hard not to call her a heroine, outright, either. What makes Elsa so fascinating - besides her incredible cryokinetic powers - can be summed up in one word: responsibility. She has been groomed from an early age to take full responsibility for just about everything. This is not only because she’s going to become queen, but also because she has to learn to try and control her magical abilities. But living in more or less self-imposed isolation for the better part of your young life leads to you not quite knowing how to act around people, and it doesn’t take too much for the cracks in the armor to show. And when she loses control, things can go very badly, very quickly. Anna’s the exact opposite: Elsa keeps her emotions bottled up till they reach boiling point, whereas, Anna’s own reclusive life - having no sister and few friends to play with most of her life - makes her something of an emotional whirlwind. She really holds nothing back, and tends to be much more impulsive. She’s more optimistic, as opposed to Elsa’s mild cynicism. Anna wants to go out and do things without hesitation, whereas, Elsa wants to remain shut-in and secure. Neither side, in the film, turns out to be completely right. It’s only through love and compromise that these two sisters are able to overcome all the obstacles they face - sometimes inadvertently caused by each other’s actions - and ultimately come out on top. Two lovely heroines for the price of one film; it’s no wonder “Frozen” remains so popular.