Turnways_Flip ![Artist - Artist -](https://derpicdn.net/badges/2016/8/23/540676fb2fd6546ee45a1c1.svg)
![The End wasn't The End - Found a new home after the great exodus of 2012 The End wasn't The End - Found a new home after the great exodus of 2012](https://derpicdn.net/badges/2016/8/22/25688c9abdc3ce6e902815.svg)
- It was a legitimate question. I didn’t understand the context behind it. I need to ask questions if I’m ever going to figure out how this is supposed to work, you know.
- It looks to me like, given the fact that she’s wearing the bunny ears, the suggestion is that being raped is supposed to be comeuppance for her behavior in Apple Family Reunion - in that episode, her being made to wear the bunny suit at the end served the same purpose.
“Highly subjective”? How? Absent context, it’s very simple; if a justification is given for why it’s okay to rape this character, and nobody seems upset by this other than the victim, it’s crossed the line.
9846 and 7026 aren’t even relevant. Of course the rapist characters are enjoying it. They’re sadistic rapists. As you just said, however, neither presents any evidence that the rape is considered a punishment for anything, or justified in any way. That doesn’t match. I am only looking at the ones that portray it as justified. The tag is, as tags are supposed to be, about what’s happening in the image, not about the artist’s opinions. Death of the author must apply here. It doesn’t matter if the artist intended to say “it’s okay to rape people as punishment for something”, only if the picture communicates that message.