(Every time I notice this post, I read it as saying “shirtless slackers”…)
adopted
-> Adoptable OCs that have been claimed. adopted offspring
-> Offspring that have been adopted (adoptive parents [and known biological parents?] tagged as normal with parent:
and parents:
tags). adoption
-> Images that are actually about adoption.How would we all feel about putting the “adopted offspring” on joke images
you're adopted
-> adopted offspring
would we tag adopted parents … with canon characters adopting other canon characters?
scootadopt
already exists, but it’s hardly the only such case, and it would be useful to codify the concept. Should we remove the “offspring” tag from images with adopted children only
Do we add parent tags for adopted characters … who have known parents, but said parents have no connection to show canon?
oc:
bit if it’s an OC (expys don’t seem to have any identifying namespace, so they’ll be unadorned). (I’ve been trying to be consistent with “primary name tag directly corresponds with parent:
tag, which is why we have such colon-cancerous constructions as parent:oc:pandora
[and why it’s parent:princess celestia
and not @parent:celestia@].) I’m tempted to create a “you’re adopted” tag to address some of the joke images.
fusion:ship name
(as @Minus intimated)? Please also addparents:sparlight -> hybrid, interspecies offspring, offspring, parent:spike, parent:starlight glimmer
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!