Posts
Search Results
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 152
cheezedoodle 
Moderator
TagZombie: AC15, Atk +8
More per ZONESS
parents:twiblood → offspring, parent:twilight sparkle, parent:prince blueblood
parents:twistarlight → magical lesbian spawn, offspring, parent:starlight glimmer, parent:twilight sparkle
parents:spidertwi → offspring, parent:peter parker, parent:twilight sparkle
parents:dan pie → offspring, parent:dan, parent:pinkie pie
Should Spidertwi and Dan Pie offspring be crossover? I think that tag would apply even if they aren’t interspecies (in the case of a ponified peter parker or dan with pony twilight or pinkie pie)
parents:twiblood → offspring, parent:twilight sparkle, parent:prince blueblood
parents:twistarlight → magical lesbian spawn, offspring, parent:starlight glimmer, parent:twilight sparkle
parents:spidertwi → offspring, parent:peter parker, parent:twilight sparkle
parents:dan pie → offspring, parent:dan, parent:pinkie pie
Should Spidertwi and Dan Pie offspring be crossover? I think that tag would apply even if they aren’t interspecies (in the case of a ponified peter parker or dan with pony twilight or pinkie pie)
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 151
Ciaran 
Perfect - thank you :)
Senior Moderator
君場森生きる
@Ciaran
Implications, not aliases.We can do anything that has a ship name, but there has to be at least one image with the parents:shipname tag in order to set up its implications. So I was able to do parents:sparlight but the trixie ones don’t exist yet.
Perfect - thank you :)
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 150
cheezedoodle
This seems to be rare? I dunno, I took a quick look at the last 250 or so images of fusions and 95% or better of them have just the fused character, or perhaps the fusion plus the component characters.
@Ciaran
Implications, not aliases.
We can do anything that has a ship name, but there has to be at least one image with the parents:shipname tag in order to set up its implications. So I was able to do parents:sparlight but the trixie ones don’t exist yet.
Moderator
TagZombie: AC15, Atk +8
@cheezedoodle
But “Fusion + Applejack + Rainbow Dash” will still show those two unfused in an image that has the mane 6 checking out an entirely seperate fusion.
This seems to be rare? I dunno, I took a quick look at the last 250 or so images of fusions and 95% or better of them have just the fused character, or perhaps the fusion plus the component characters.
@Ciaran
Implications, not aliases.
We can do anything that has a ship name, but there has to be at least one image with the parents:shipname tag in order to set up its implications. So I was able to do parents:sparlight but the trixie ones don’t exist yet.
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 149
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 148
DragonMaus 
Please also addparents:sparlight -> hybrid, interspecies offspring, offspring, parent:spike, parent:starlight glimmer
Fixed (“spalight” -> “sparlight”).
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 147
Ciaran
Senior Moderator
君場森生きる
Please also add
parents:sparlight → hybrid, interspecies offspring, offspring, parent:spike, parent:starlight glimmer
parents:sparlight → hybrid, interspecies offspring, offspring, parent:spike, parent:starlight glimmer
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 146
Ciaran
Senior Moderator
君場森生きる
@cheezedoodle
Do you want to add aliases for all parents? Or just ones where there’s a significant number.
If it’s for all, please add:
parents:ursatrix → interspecies offspring, implied bestiality, hybrid, offspring, parent:ursa minor, parent:trixie
parents:mantitrix → interspecies offspring, implied bestiality, hybrid, offspring, parent:manticore, parent:trixie
Do you want to add aliases for all parents? Or just ones where there’s a significant number.
If it’s for all, please add:
parents:ursatrix → interspecies offspring, implied bestiality, hybrid, offspring, parent:ursa minor, parent:trixie
parents:mantitrix → interspecies offspring, implied bestiality, hybrid, offspring, parent:manticore, parent:trixie
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 145
Minus 
Leader of the G4 purists
@cheezedoodle
But “Fusion + Applejack + Rainbow Dash” will still show those two unfused in an image that has the mane 6 checking out an entirely seperate fusion. Thus people using shipping tags + fusion instead, but that then leaves lots of wrong tags on the image, and it shows up in shipping searches.
But “Fusion + Applejack + Rainbow Dash” will still show those two unfused in an image that has the mane 6 checking out an entirely seperate fusion. Thus people using shipping tags + fusion instead, but that then leaves lots of wrong tags on the image, and it shows up in shipping searches.
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 144
cheezedoodle
Moderator
TagZombie: AC15, Atk +8
Added (per ZONESS)
parents:chrysombra → hybrid, interspecies offspring, offspring, parent:king sombra, parent:queen chrysalis
parents:snailstwist → offspring, parent:snails, parent:twist
parents:spikebloom → dracony, hybrid, interspecies offspring, offspring, parent:apple bloom, parent:spike
parents:flimjack → offspring, parent:applejack, parent:flim
parents:scootadash → magical lesbian spawn, offspring, parent:scootaloo, parent:rainbow dash
parents:sombrashy → offspring, parent:fluttershy, parent:king sombra
parents:bluedash → offspring, parent:prince blueblood, parent:rainbow dash
parents:dinkysqueak → offspring, parent:dinky hooves, parent:pipsqueak
parents:scootaweight → offspring, parent:featherweight, parent:scootaloo
parents:azuna → offspring, parent:oc:azure knight, parent:princess luna, parents:canon x oc
I guess I’m not seeing the difficulty with fusions. They should have tagged all the characters that make up the fusion, plus “fusion” itself and that’s about it. Doesn’t seem hard to search for…
parents:chrysombra → hybrid, interspecies offspring, offspring, parent:king sombra, parent:queen chrysalis
parents:snailstwist → offspring, parent:snails, parent:twist
parents:spikebloom → dracony, hybrid, interspecies offspring, offspring, parent:apple bloom, parent:spike
parents:flimjack → offspring, parent:applejack, parent:flim
parents:scootadash → magical lesbian spawn, offspring, parent:scootaloo, parent:rainbow dash
parents:sombrashy → offspring, parent:fluttershy, parent:king sombra
parents:bluedash → offspring, parent:prince blueblood, parent:rainbow dash
parents:dinkysqueak → offspring, parent:dinky hooves, parent:pipsqueak
parents:scootaweight → offspring, parent:featherweight, parent:scootaloo
parents:azuna → offspring, parent:oc:azure knight, parent:princess luna, parents:canon x oc
I guess I’m not seeing the difficulty with fusions. They should have tagged all the characters that make up the fusion, plus “fusion” itself and that’s about it. Doesn’t seem hard to search for…
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 143
DragonMaus
@Minus
Yep. Still include the character tags, since they’re still technically in the image.
Yep. Still include the character tags, since they’re still technically in the image.
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 142
Minus
Leader of the G4 purists
@DragonWraith
Sounds good to me. As it is now we still have the problem of solo images having lesbian tags like we did with the offspring.
But with that new tag, we’d still be adding the character tags right? Without them we’d not be able to find all fusions with a specific character… Even if it still feels odd to have a fusion show up when looking for a specific character. But this sounds like it’ll work without being complex, so I’m for it.
Sounds good to me. As it is now we still have the problem of solo images having lesbian tags like we did with the offspring.
But with that new tag, we’d still be adding the character tags right? Without them we’d not be able to find all fusions with a specific character… Even if it still feels odd to have a fusion show up when looking for a specific character. But this sounds like it’ll work without being complex, so I’m for it.
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 141
DragonMaus
@saby
Having the ship tag on a fusion seems wrong, but you’re correct that it’s not easy to search for them otherwise. Maybe use
(Fortunately, fusion is a lot simpler than offspring, so that one change ought to do it.)
Having the ship tag on a fusion seems wrong, but you’re correct that it’s not easy to search for them otherwise. Maybe use
fusion:ship name (as @Minus intimated)? (Fortunately, fusion is a lot simpler than offspring, so that one change ought to do it.)
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 140
saby 
Moderator
Anti Fun Officer
Just to clarify, fusions aren’t supposed to have ship tags? Hexafusions aren’t that bad because they include the originals, but then there are solo pics of fusions between canon characters, which also have ship tags. But if that ship tag’s removed there’s no way to search for the fusion sorted by which original’s involved. “Implied $CHARACTER” also feels wrong.
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 139
DragonMaus
@Minus
Probably not. I’m pretty sure that, since the original ponies are still technically present in the gestalt, you tag them normally.
Probably not. I’m pretty sure that, since the original ponies are still technically present in the gestalt, you tag them normally.
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 138
Minus
Leader of the G4 purists
@DragonWraith
Wait, how do I tag fusion images? Do I tag the characters, or use their implication tags?.. Deja vu.
This going to end in a “fusion:” tag being made isn’t it?
Wait, how do I tag fusion images? Do I tag the characters, or use their implication tags?.. Deja vu.
This going to end in a “fusion:” tag being made isn’t it?
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 137
DragonMaus
@Minus
I can’t believe I missed that; I looked at the source and everything.
I changed it to the other threesome spawn (>>995893), so feel free to fix those tags.
The reason I went with the Rainbow Dash one is because the other one is mixed in with a bunch of other offspring, so the tagging example isn’t as clear.
Once another solo threesome spawn comes along, I’ll change it again.
I can’t believe I missed that; I looked at the source and everything.
I changed it to the other threesome spawn (>>995893), so feel free to fix those tags.
The reason I went with the Rainbow Dash one is because the other one is mixed in with a bunch of other offspring, so the tagging example isn’t as clear.
Once another solo threesome spawn comes along, I’ll change it again.
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 136
Minus
Leader of the G4 purists
Just came back to say great job! I only just now realised this was put into place. It’s turned out more complicated than I expected, but I am so glad to see this problem finally fixed! And I really like the way you’ve done it! However the example picture for 3 parents >>868641 is an image I really want to change the tags on to “fusion”. I don’t think this is meant to be an offspring. But if I change it I’d be ruining your example…
EDIT: Just realised it has the fusion tag already. But having both fusion and offspring together doesn’t seem right so, I guess what I meant to say is that I want to remove the offspring tags. Pretty sure the shipping tags got put on accidentally anyway, probably because the uploader used RariJackDash incorrectly.
EDIT: Just realised it has the fusion tag already. But having both fusion and offspring together doesn’t seem right so, I guess what I meant to say is that I want to remove the offspring tags. Pretty sure the shipping tags got put on accidentally anyway, probably because the uploader used RariJackDash incorrectly.
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 134
DragonMaus
@saby
Done, though those are more “things I’ve forgotten and/or missed”.
The Special Cases section is growing a bit unwieldy; I wish there was a way to generalize them out into the main spec.
Done, though those are more “things I’ve forgotten and/or missed”.
The Special Cases section is growing a bit unwieldy; I wish there was a way to generalize them out into the main spec.
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 133
saby
Moderator
Anti Fun Officer
@DragonWraith
suggestions:
suggestions:
- how to tag oc parent (parent:oc:name)
- tagging threesome parents
- magical threesome spawn (it has 2 members now, and is expected to grow slowly)
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 132
DragonMaus
Version 2.0.0 is live.
As always, if I’ve forgotten or missed anything, or gotten anything wrong, or if you just have a suggestion, please let me know.
As always, if I’ve forgotten or missed anything, or gotten anything wrong, or if you just have a suggestion, please let me know.
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 131
DragonMaus
How would we all feel about putting the “adopted offspring” on joke images
I’d say it still counts. It might even be worth adding an implication
you're adopted -> adopted offspring would we tag adopted parents … with canon characters adopting other canon characters?
Definitely.
scootadopt already exists, but it’s hardly the only such case, and it would be useful to codify the concept. Should we remove the “offspring” tag from images with adopted children only
Yes.
Do we add parent tags for adopted characters … who have known parents, but said parents have no connection to show canon?
Yes. Just make sure to add the
oc: bit if it’s an OC (expys don’t seem to have any identifying namespace, so they’ll be unadorned). (I’ve been trying to be consistent with “primary name tag directly corresponds with parent: tag, which is why we have such colon-cancerous constructions as parent:oc:pandora [and why it’s parent:princess celestia and not @parent:celestia@].) I’m tempted to create a “you’re adopted” tag to address some of the joke images.
That ticks all of the boxes for “reasonable cause to create a new tag”, so I say go for it.
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 130
ZONESS 
@DragonWraith
A quick look through the “adopted” and “adoption” tags, and it looks like this could work.
How would we all feel about putting the “adopted offspring” on joke images like this >>989961 and would we tag adopted parents for images such as this >>1079181 with canon characters adopting other canon characters? Should we remove the “offspring” tag from images with adopted children only so there is a distinction for images like this >>938839 that have both adopted and biological children in them (and the adopted child isn’t a griffon to make it obvious)? Do we add parent tags for adopted characters like this >>1051228 who have known parents, but said parents have no connection to show canon?
Those are all the concerns I can think of. I’m tempted to create a “you’re adopted” tag to address some of the joke images. There are enough images to support it, surprisingly >>216045.
A quick look through the “adopted” and “adoption” tags, and it looks like this could work.
How would we all feel about putting the “adopted offspring” on joke images like this >>989961 and would we tag adopted parents for images such as this >>1079181 with canon characters adopting other canon characters? Should we remove the “offspring” tag from images with adopted children only so there is a distinction for images like this >>938839 that have both adopted and biological children in them (and the adopted child isn’t a griffon to make it obvious)? Do we add parent tags for adopted characters like this >>1051228 who have known parents, but said parents have no connection to show canon?
Those are all the concerns I can think of. I’m tempted to create a “you’re adopted” tag to address some of the joke images. There are enough images to support it, surprisingly >>216045.
Showing results 1 - 25 of 154 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |