Posts

Due to things and reasons, you may need to add the human exhibitionism tag to your lists. Apologies.

While it is easy enough to add human exhibitionism to our filters, because it is so similar to what was decided with this poll, I’m wondering if perhaps it would be best to add that as an auto-spoiled tag as well. Several users in >>372534 feel that way, and I agree with them, especially since after looking at the tag (and sticking with suggestive), they’re all nearly naked people (I realize that’s the point), and that is probably not what most people come to Derpibooru to see, as evidenced by this poll. Just something to consider. :S

@The Smiling Pony  
>implying we wouldn’t fight over your corpse

@sirvancelot  

 
 
As long as I still breath there will be strife on the booru.

@sirvancelot  
that i doubt, but we will coexist nicely.

Now hopefully everyone can be happy :D

@The Frowning Pony  
and thus harmony was restored in the booru.

Hooray for intelligent discussion bringing about positive results!  
More clarification: If you’re cosplaying in a swimsuit, you probably don’t need the tag. If you’re just wearing pony underwear…you do. See the difference?

Human Nudity goes back to exactly what it sounds like and remains spoilered. Human Exhibitionism is (non default) the tag that will be used to cover both human nudity and people in various states of dress or undress that are essentially just showing themselves off. Human Nudity implies this tag. For clarification, pictures of cosplayers that aren’t half-naked (or more) and aren’t provocatively posed or something should not get either tag.
 
tl’dr: spoiler applies to less images because of new tag with broader definition.

@ender1200  
Yeah, tag removed.

@The Smiling Pony  
I was talking about >>370556 which was brought up by BigMax in this discussion and is marked human nudity while it’s a full fledged cosplay (though indeed a suggestive one). I am under the impression that this is a mistag.

@ender1200  
I consider there to be a slight difference between cosplay and someone wearing panties with a cutie mark on them, though.

@WingbeatPony
 
“human exhibitionism” dose sound better, and will be less likely to be removed by accident. I’m all for it.  
As for suggestive cosplay pictures i don’t think that they should be censored. They fall squarely in what this site is meant to accommodate and are not more offensive than normal suggestive pictures.

@SeraphimDawn  
I don’t even know.

@Background Pony
 
@Sjogre
 
@The_Mungoman  
How did this POLL thread about a Derpibooru rule turn into a debate about nipples?

@Background Pony  
Well, male nipples are just because the genetic code for nipples is constructed before the actual second X- or Y-chromosome that determines your gender kicks in.  
I don’t know how that is even relevant.

@Background Pony  
Female nipples make milk. Male nipples just kinda sit there.

Why are female nipples more “racy” than male nipples? That’s pretty sexist.

@WingbeatPony
 
I think that would work much better. From the comments here, I gather that it’s exhibitionism that people object to seeing, not just nudity. (Nudity being defined as “The state or quality of being without clothing on the body; specifically, the quality of being without clothing on the genitals or female nipples.”, which is I think how most people define it.)

I’d still consider the second one only suggestive, rather than explicit.

@BigMax  

 
It’s my personal opinion that swimsuits/generally clothed stuff like that doesn’t need to be filtered by default, but you really ought to take that up with TheSmilingPony. I can use two very, very similar images to illustrate where I’d draw the line: >>358202 is just a mirror selfie of a swimsuit, nothing overtly sexual. >>368022 on the other hand is underwear, with the implication of actively undressing, which I would consider sexual.

Before proceeding, may I ask if >>370556 should be covered by that tag?  
To me, it’s just a full-clothed woman with a suggestive pose.
 
Are the usual tags (“irl human” and “suggestive”) enough for this kind of pictures?

@ender1200
 
Actually, I have a suggestion. I propose “human exhibitionism” as the spoilered tag, as that’d cover the scantily-clad and diapered as well. “human nudity” could return to being a normal tag that would merely imply the human exhibitionism tag.
 
If you guys like that idea, I’ll see if TSP can make it a reality.

@ender1200  
I think your definition of nudity is debatable.  
The one given by the Wiktionary is not.
 
For a better wording, I’d use “undressed human” or “disrobed human”, but I’d rather leave the task to someone who has English as the mother language.

Nudity also means wearing less clothes than socially acceptable.  
So a person in it’s underwear is considered naked in a public aria.
 
Do you have a better wording for this tag?