Posts

Sorry, misclick

@Wing Regent
This is the topic for tag age ratings, not tags in general.

How tagging art with doll? Should the species of doll be indicated, as well as the presence of a cybernetic leg?

a fair number of these is probably safe, if someone wants to go over it

@Princess Luna
In regards to Brokedownandmadeone’s concern, pay attention to the “steam” you can clearly see over the buttcheeks.

@Blissful690
Spike is submissive to Rarity, letting her jump up and down on his tail, it doesn’t make it family-unfriendly.

@Brokedownandmadeone
I see no “musk”, nor understand why that would demand a different rating. It’s just large nude human buttcheeks, standard Suggestive stuff.

@Background Pony #EC2B
That’s a full body shot, so unless her “ass” is her entire body, you’re mistaken…and with nothing sexualizing that, it wouldn’t be Suggestive even if it zoomed in to make that 10% instead 90%. We’re a site based around a show where these are normal moments:

>>3333119
should this be marked suggestive? her ass is basically taking up the whole screen

>>3387955
Presenting rear + musk I thought would fall under questionable territory.

@Blissful690
Yes they can. BDSM power exchange does not have to be limited to sexy times. A perfectly safe image of a submissive could be something like a submissive character cleaning house, or massaging their dominant, or even simply physically lowering themselves in the physical or symbolic presence of a dominant character. Visual clues like devotion collar or sissifying outfit can suggest that it’s specifically a submissive doing service.

/edit to address actual images on site

Rating comments for themes that get tagged safe, submissive a lot (to keep thing simple, I won’t say anything about the validity of ‘submissive’):

All of these are easily ‘safe’ if there’s no nudity, suggestive touching/poses/view angles, implication of genital contact, or suggestive reactions. All of these appear rather frequently in TV shows approved for ages 7 and up (which is our reference frame for ‘safe’), or otherwise in media that is targeted and approved for small children.

Can images with “submissive” characters be safe? Because there’s a lot of images with “submissive” characters that are rated “safe”, and I don’t think that’s very family friendly if you ask me.

>>3334027 should be questionable rather than explicit, right?

@Brokedownandmadeone
Have you tried reporting the image and/or talking a staff member about the issue? 🤔

>>3332596
Tags were changed again before tag lock but wasn’t sure if it was just dubious consent or proper rape. Feels like former with nervousness/fear but still looking like he wanted to and in the last panel seems like genuine desire for her to take her time. Currently has both along with spikeabuse, abuse.

@Background Pony #4230
Right.

@Background Pony #BC65
Just them calling it that doesn’t really matter for ratings, only how things look in the end result.

@Brokedownandmadeone
Secretions are a difficult one when they’re from a sexual orifice but not sexual in nature, and they can just be at Suggestive.

>>3334809
Explicit due to the inherent implication of secretions or leave as-is?

Requesting rating check for >>3061905. currently set to semi-grimdark, should it be grimdark instead?

Semi-grimdark description states “Minor physical/sexual abuse, including very dubious consent”. But since the original upload by one of the artists who worked on the animation, the game has been stated as tentacle rape porn.

Also not sure on the tags of dubious consent and dubious consentacles. While the tentacles don’t visibly maim Applejack, they clearly aren’t being gentle on her and her visual discomfort lasts throughout the entire animation

If I’m not missing something, >>108063 would be safe or maybe semi-grimdark, definitely not explicit, right?

@Snicky
That part of the guidelines is about the character’s action, not the camera’s, zooming in on a butt is something done in FiM itself at times, but there’s no direct equivalent for the dancing motion. The image is currently under review.

@Background Pony #B065
Oh shit ur right lol

@icicle wicicle 1517
Wrong thread.

.

@Princess Luna
Would you mind explaining to us how the image that Snicky refers to falls under “safe”?

>>3314194 was changed to Safe by staff, but is pretty aggressively Suggestive.

As per the Suggestive description “Sexually showing off part of the body or a situation with more than just a saucy look, like presenting a butt or stroking a stuffed belly seductively “ and I think the camera being zoomed in on Fluttershy twerking at it clearly counts as “presenting a butt”.

@Background Pony #4230
First one seems Questionable, second and third seem Explicit, but I’ll have to check further. Not sure about the last, detail on dildos can push them to Explicit.

Rating check:
>>2250148 is currently questionable, should it be explicit instead?

>>2556541 is currently questionable, is it indeed showing “Moderately-detailed genital or anus outlines in clothing” or does it reach explicit-level?
Same question: >>3015863

Isn’t a sex toy, such as a dildo, not in use not automatically explicit? For example, should >>3289822 (currently explicit) be rated down to questionable?