Posts

For more information, see the search syntax documentation. Search results are sorted by creation date.

Search Results

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1690

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1689

Princess Luna
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Thread Starter - Started a thread with over 100 pages
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Notoriously Divine Tagger - Consistently uploads images above and beyond the minimum tag requirements. And/or additionally, bringing over the original description from the source if the image has one. Does NOT apply to the uploader adding several to a dozen tags after originally uploading with minimum to bare tagging.
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Economist -
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <%Nebulon> Yeah, just fetch me a smaller anus, sweetie.
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
From the Night -

Senior Moderator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
@Litrojia
The bulging can be perspective-interpreted differently as not being a bulge, but a crease in the fabric (pushing out towards the crotch as it goes in and under that line); I wouldn’t call that “prominent”.

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1688

Litrojia
Cottonwood Kindle - For supporting the site
Nightmare in the Moon - Had their OC in the 2024 Derpibooru Collab.
Pixel Perfection - Hot Pockets Spotted
Solar Guardian - Refused to surrender in the face of the Lunar rebellion and showed utmost loyalty to the Solar Empire (April Fools 2023).
Tree of Harmony -
Elements of Harmony - Had an OC in the 2022 Community Collab
Non-Fungible Trixie -
Artistic Detective - For hunting down artist when their names have changed
Happy Derpy! - For site supporters
Bronze Supporter - Bronze Supporter

@LightningBolt
I feel like this should count as a “prominent low-detail genital outline in clothing”. If not, that plus the pose sells it as suggestive to me. The intent’s clear. Questionable seems excessive to me too, but the fact that the artist tagged it as such tells me they think it’s sexual to some extent.

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1687

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1686

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1685

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1684

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1683

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1682

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1681

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1680

Background Pony #4230
Derpibooru has no distinction between sexual bondage and non-sexual restraints.
That’s the tag unsexy bondage.
Similarly, it has no distinction between regular transformations and transformation fetish.
Just the presence or absence of the tag fetish is meant for those kinds of distinctions.

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1679

Background Pony #D5F9
@Background Pony #F59E
I agree that these images are NSFW, but Derpi’s rating tags are based on specific things that are shown in the image, not the overall vibe. This makes the rules less ambiguous, but also less intuitive.
Fortunately, you can filter out most of similar stuff by using specific tags that these images have: bondage on image 1, the ass was fat/large butt on image 2. It might have some collateral damage - some innocent images might be blocked too. Derpibooru has no distinction between sexual bondage and non-sexual restraints. Similarly, it has no distinction between regular transformations and transformation fetish. It is what it is.

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1678

Background Pony #F59E
What about >>3427311 ? How is that not sexual? Or fucking >>3206059. I don’t even get why it’s tagged sexy, but fine. Why is that safe? I don’t wanna see it on my feed. I don’t understand these rating tags.

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1677

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1676

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1675

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1674

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1673

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1672

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1671

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1670

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1669

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1668

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1667

Background Pony #4230
@Princess Luna
There is tag warring going on with the rating of these. (I can’t open a report about it because I am presently at the limit for open reports.)
Posted Report

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1666

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field SelectorTypeDescriptionExample
authorLiteralMatches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term.author:Joey
bodyFull TextMatches the body of this post. This is the default field.body:test
created_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation time of this post.created_at:2015
idNumeric RangeMatches the numeric surrogate key for this post.id:1000000
myMetamy:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. my:posts
subjectFull TextMatches the title of the topic.subject:time wasting thread
topic_idLiteralMatches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.topic_id:7000
topic_positionNumeric RangeMatches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.topic_position:0
updated_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation or last edit time of this post.updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago
user_idLiteralMatches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.user_id:211190
forumLiteralMatches the short name for the forum this post belongs to.forum:meta