General Tag Discussion
when she felt her wings unfold
Goodbye Ponk Pie Hat
@Zeb
Okay, done!
— About 200 images are in “medley (g1)”, and I’ve checked them as best I can.
— The “spring melody” and “sprinkle melody” tags don’t overlap with “medley (g1)”. “sprinkle medley” has about 800 images.
— The “medley” tag is empty now, and “medley (g1)” can be moved to it.
Over to you I think. Thanks!
Okay, done!
— About 200 images are in “medley (g1)”, and I’ve checked them as best I can.
— The “spring melody” and “sprinkle melody” tags don’t overlap with “medley (g1)”. “sprinkle medley” has about 800 images.
— The “medley” tag is empty now, and “medley (g1)” can be moved to it.
Over to you I think. Thanks!
Binkyt11
Sleep isn't real.
I couldn’t find the artist tag thread, but maybe Adorkable Twilight and Friends should be aliased into artist:adorkabletwilightandfriends. Or athe least implied.
Icicle Niceicle 1517
Ocs,Boops,Tickles&Memes
@Zeb
Zeb, sorry if I’m sounding like an ass, but who are you doing with the “X is not amused” tags and implications?
Zeb, sorry if I’m sounding like an ass, but who are you doing with the “X is not amused” tags and implications?
Icicle Niceicle 1517
Ocs,Boops,Tickles&Memes
Also, should this image really have the “cringeworthy” tag?
Icicle Niceicle 1517
Ocs,Boops,Tickles&Memes
@Zeb
The anon uploader on it keeps trying to add the tag back in. Can you try and tell him to cut it out?
Also thanks.
The anon uploader on it keeps trying to add the tag back in. Can you try and tell him to cut it out?
Also thanks.
The Smiling Pony
( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡° )
@Deserter
Looks more like a threesome to me. I mean, Twi could at any point move her tail or wings and realize, and she’s looking at Sunset that’s sitting right next to her while ~horns are touching~.
Looks more like a threesome to me. I mean, Twi could at any point move her tail or wings and realize, and she’s looking at Sunset that’s sitting right next to her while ~horns are touching~.
DragonMaus
@The Smiling Pony
It’s a reference to an old picture that was featured in LIFE magazine decades ago. The intent is to display that A and B are in a public relationship and A and C are in a secret relationship.
It’s a reference to an old picture that was featured in LIFE magazine decades ago. The intent is to display that A and B are in a public relationship and A and C are in a secret relationship.
The Smiling Pony
( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡° )
@DragonWraith
LIFE magazine seems like a hive of degeneracy whose employees and readers should be dragged into the streets and branded, IMO.
LIFE magazine seems like a hive of degeneracy whose employees and readers should be dragged into the streets and branded, IMO.
Prof.NightJack
Gizmonics Scientist
I know I bought this up before some time ago but spoiler:s07e22, spoiler:s07e23, and spoiler:s07e24 still have the wrong implications for them.
22 has nothing when it should be “marks and recreation”, 23 has “marks and recreation” when it should have “secrets and pies”, and 24 has “secrets and pies” when it’s one of the ones still not named.
22 has nothing when it should be “marks and recreation”, 23 has “marks and recreation” when it should have “secrets and pies”, and 24 has “secrets and pies” when it’s one of the ones still not named.
Icicle Niceicle 1517
Ocs,Boops,Tickles&Memes
@Zeb
Wait, why did you add Cringeworthy to it then delete it again? 0_o
Wait, why did you add Cringeworthy to it then delete it again? 0_o
Icicle Niceicle 1517
Ocs,Boops,Tickles&Memes
@Zeb
So, I take it if you want to make sure a tag dosn;t get added again, you add it then remove it?
So, I take it if you want to make sure a tag dosn;t get added again, you add it then remove it?
Barhandar
(twi|pony)booru.org
So uh. I want to search for pictures like these, where the character(s) is in the middle of putting something on, being bound up, or otherwise the picture depicts a similar process. Question: what tag should I put on such pictures to that end?
||Welcome to counterproductive (filtered images show “this image is hidden” ignoring spoiler entirely) spoiler block!
>>1489712t (deleted)
||
||Welcome to counterproductive (filtered images show “this image is hidden” ignoring spoiler entirely) spoiler block!
>>1489712t (deleted)
||
SuperSupermario24
fluffy sylveon
@Barhandar
Using spoilers with internal embeds isn’t just counterproductive, it’s actually a bad idea. If you have the tags spoilered or hidden, clicking on the notice just gives you a blank spoiler (and clicking on it again just leads to the image page, which is annoying):
Using spoilers with internal embeds isn’t just counterproductive, it’s actually a bad idea. If you have the tags spoilered or hidden, clicking on the notice just gives you a blank spoiler (and clicking on it again just leads to the image page, which is annoying):
Shayzorr
@SuperSupermario24
It could be a bug. Mouseover revealed all four picks. But when I clicked on one of Barhandar’s pics to clear it, the other three permablanked. I am not hiding or spoilering anything at the moment.
Edit: It could be because all four pics are under a single spoiler tag. If each of them has its own spoiler, they behave normally.
It could be a bug. Mouseover revealed all four picks. But when I clicked on one of Barhandar’s pics to clear it, the other three permablanked. I am not hiding or spoilering anything at the moment.
Edit: It could be because all four pics are under a single spoiler tag. If each of them has its own spoiler, they behave normally.
Archonix
Retired Ass
@Shayzorr
Regardless, spoilering on-site embeds is entirely pointless as they will already be hidden by the tag filters a user has applied. If a user is browsing the site in circumstances where they don’t want particular images or tags to be visible, then they should be browsing with those filters applied no matter where they are on the site.
Regardless, spoilering on-site embeds is entirely pointless as they will already be hidden by the tag filters a user has applied. If a user is browsing the site in circumstances where they don’t want particular images or tags to be visible, then they should be browsing with those filters applied no matter where they are on the site.
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!