Fame and Misfortune - A terrible pile of cynical forced meta shit with the subtlety of a sledgehammer.
Well, that’s… succinct. I’m going to have to disagree with you though.
I hate the boneheaded premise.
Why exactly is it a “boneheaded” premise? Twilight was originally allowed to stay in Ponyville to learn about friendship, after all, and as the current princess of that very thing, publishing the things she learned about it, along with the lessons learned by her friends, sounds like very much the sort of thing she should be doing. I mean, I get that it’s kind of a meta thing for Twilight to think that stories about her and her friends might be entertaining and help teach important lessons, but that doesn’t mean it’s incorrect or contrived either. Honestly, the least controversial thing about this episode should be Twilight wanting to provide friendship lessons to kids based on her past experiences.
I hate Twilight’s preachy lectures.
Then I have to ask if you’ve been paying attention, because that’s been an aspect of her character since… pretty much the beginning of the series. She even says as much in the episode “Luna Eclipsed”.
Twilight Sparkle: “It’s not over yet.”
Applejack: “What are you gonna do?”
Twilight Sparkle: “I’m going to do what I do best. Lecture her!”
That said, I don’t find her lecture in the episode “preachy”. For me she comes across as (understandably) frustrated trying to respond rationally to a crowd that has misinterpreted and misunderstood entirely what the journal was published for, and ponies who do not seem to know at times what their own point is.
Twilight Sparkle: “It feels like everypony in Equestria is missing the ‘friendship’ part of the friendship journals.”
I hate how it portrays all critics as unreasonable whiners when some of them have valid points.
I would hate that too, if I thought it was in any way something the episode portrayed.
Yet no one is arguing against the idea that critics of the show can have valid points. The problem being shown, however, is more akin to missing the forest for the trees. A fantasy reviewer criticizing a work for being unrealistic might be accurate, after all, but it misses the fact that the fantastic and farfetched is a fundamental aspect of the fantasy genre. The fan ponies shown in this episode have similar issues. Collectors who own copies solely because of the name attached, but haven’t actually engaged in the material. Ponies who can’t understand why multiple lessons would be needed to learn something, but don’t like it when the “character” actually changes. Reviewers who talk about unrelated ideas they think would have worked better, rather than the reality that actually took place. All capable of having a point, but as depicted, missing the significant issues that make what they have to say relevant.
I hate how the writers used the characters as mouthpieces to vent their frustrations with the fandom.
To be fair, if they were, they wouldn’t be doing anything the fandom itself hasn’t done before. That said, I doubt they’re actually using them as mouthpieces, or there would have been a lot more fanfiction rebuffs.
Besides, it is not the fandom that is the problem, merely the attitudes and actions of some fans.
But perhaps what I hate most of all is the smug assholes who try to belittle anyone who says they don’t like the episode.
You know what? Fair enough. I disagree with you on the majority of the issues related to your interpretation of the episode, but I disagree with belittling you just because you didn’t care for it. I’ll argue, I’ll debate, I’ll quibble semantics, but I do not agree with insulting another side jest for disagreeing with me.